TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

CS Rankings excludes important CS research from ECE/EE deptartments

19 点作者 l31g大约 5 年前

3 条评论

azhenley大约 5 年前
One of the exclusions that I find interesting is any faculty that has a joint position at a company. A lot of great professors get 0 credit because of this.<p>Another one is that you are penalized for having student authors on your papers.
l31g大约 5 年前
According to csrankings.org&#x27;s FAQ, they only include professors who can advise a CS-only student. The conflict is that the website includes areas (like &quot;Embedded &amp; real-time systems&quot;, &quot;Robotics&quot;, and &quot;Computer Architecture&quot;) that are traditionally done in EE and ECE departments. One significant example is UT Austin&#x27;s prolific ECE department.
评论 #22776066 未加载
评论 #22776118 未加载
LolWolf大约 5 年前
Huh, not sure why Stephen Boyd is not included in the Stanford list, but John Duchi is (if you’re reading this John, I’m only a little sorry! ;). He’s on the top 10 highest citation count of all Stanford professors behind essentially Hastie and Tibshirani (both of <i>Elements of Statistical Learning</i> fame), and both of which I’m also surprised are not included, even though they can all advise CS-only students.<p>This is a bit silly of course because Stanford has a full cross-department policy, where the student’s department and their PhD advisors can be <i>completely unrelated</i>. (I’m not exaggerating at all when I’m saying this, and this policy also includes the Business and Medicine schools. There are EE professors who have business school students even without a courtesy appointment in the school of business. Similar things happen in the Medical school, etc.)<p>I wonder how that (for Stanford and other schools) would change the rankings.