TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Sewage could reveal true scale of coronavirus outbreak

184 点作者 plcancel大约 5 年前

15 条评论

jart大约 5 年前
Before anyone goes collecting sewage samples, consider deriving your scaling factors from discrepencies in ICD-10 diagnostic encoding practices.<p>- Stacked bar chart: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;OccupyWallSt&#x2F;status&#x2F;1246478379064295425&#x2F;photo&#x2F;1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;OccupyWallSt&#x2F;status&#x2F;1246478379064295425&#x2F;...</a><p>- Govt data: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;data.cdc.gov&#x2F;NCHS&#x2F;Provisional-Death-Counts-for-Coronavirus-Disease-C&#x2F;hc4f-j6nb" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;data.cdc.gov&#x2F;NCHS&#x2F;Provisional-Death-Counts-for-Coron...</a><p>ICD-10 is really the heart of the matter. Earlier recommendations have asked doctors to encode corona death information using Pneumonia (J12.89) or Bronchitis (J20.8, J40) if positive test results are available, suffixed by B97.29 if authorized by the CDC to do so. We now appear to finally have the pneumonia encoded info thanks to NCHS. Hopefully govt will open source the bronchitis encoded reports too.<p>See also:<p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cdc.gov&#x2F;nchs&#x2F;data&#x2F;icd&#x2F;ICD-10-CM-Official-Coding-Gudance-Interim-Advice-coronavirus-feb-20-2020.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cdc.gov&#x2F;nchs&#x2F;data&#x2F;icd&#x2F;ICD-10-CM-Official-Coding-...</a><p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cdc.gov&#x2F;nchs&#x2F;data&#x2F;icd&#x2F;ICD-10-CM-April-1-2020-addenda.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cdc.gov&#x2F;nchs&#x2F;data&#x2F;icd&#x2F;ICD-10-CM-April-1-2020-add...</a><p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cdc.gov&#x2F;nchs&#x2F;data&#x2F;icd&#x2F;COVID-19-guidelines-final.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cdc.gov&#x2F;nchs&#x2F;data&#x2F;icd&#x2F;COVID-19-guidelines-final....</a>
评论 #22783747 未加载
评论 #22785821 未加载
fludlight大约 5 年前
Actual paper:<p>Presence of SARS-Coronavirus-2 in sewage &#x2F; Medema, et al.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.medrxiv.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;10.1101&#x2F;2020.03.29.20045880v1.full.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.medrxiv.org&#x2F;content&#x2F;10.1101&#x2F;2020.03.29.20045880v...</a><p>Check out Table 4.
评论 #22783028 未加载
mirimir大约 5 年前
Interesting. That&#x27;s also been done for recreational drugs. And artificial vanilla flavoring.<p>I wonder whether sampling from sewage pumping units could be done. That might produce higher resolution data. But getting representative samples would be harder. You&#x27;d probably need to take large samples, mix, and subsample.
评论 #22782801 未加载
评论 #22782567 未加载
评论 #22783042 未加载
dontbenebby大约 5 年前
Ah yes, the quantified toilets joke from SIGCHI 2014 has come to unironic fruition:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&#x2F;technology&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2014&#x2F;04&#x2F;what-a-toilet-hoax-can-tell-us-about-the-future-of-surveillance&#x2F;361408&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.theatlantic.com&#x2F;technology&#x2F;archive&#x2F;2014&#x2F;04&#x2F;what-...</a><p>It was meant as a prank, not an instruction manual.
jerzyt大约 5 年前
What a wonderful symmetry to the cholera outbreak in 1854 in London, where John Snow traced the sources to drinking water wells: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;1854_Broad_Street_cholera_outbreak" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;1854_Broad_Street_cholera_outb...</a>
评论 #22783751 未加载
cameldrv大约 5 年前
I’ve been wondering about this. It would be especially interesting if, after we come out of lockdown, we could sample sewage at many points as the sewer comes together. You might be able for example to identify an infected block and then go around to give individual swabs to each resident if the block came up positive.
jerzyt大约 5 年前
This should also allow to monitor for mutations of the Covid 19, whereas it would be impractical to do at an individual level. It would give an early warning signal.
dhash大约 5 年前
There’s a YC company [0] already doing this.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.biobot.io&#x2F;covid19" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.biobot.io&#x2F;covid19</a>
评论 #22783853 未加载
thdrdt大约 5 年前
Serious question: are there &#x27;pandemics&#x27; we don&#x27;t hear about because the virus doesn&#x27;t hurt us? Are those outbreaks also studied?
评论 #22785513 未加载
darkerside大约 5 年前
I&#x27;m sure there are great reasons, but why is it that we can&#x27;t detect the virus in wastewater at a personal level? Could this be a less invasive way to test for covid19?
评论 #22782423 未加载
评论 #22782448 未加载
评论 #22783214 未加载
DoingIsLearning大约 5 年前
Public statement from the Dutch CDC (RIVM) on this method:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rivm.nl&#x2F;node&#x2F;153991" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.rivm.nl&#x2F;node&#x2F;153991</a>
awaythrower大约 5 年前
Maybe. Similar to drug testing an entire city using sewage.
yalogin大约 5 年前
That is interesting. Do we now what the rate at which the virus dies in water?
评论 #22782849 未加载
hkai大约 5 年前
Incidentally, we can also test sewage for drugs and then swat places where people consume drugs. How very helpful. It&#x27;s just because we need to fight the virus! ️
potiuper大约 5 年前
Except in areas without sewer