TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How Antennas Work

250 点作者 codesuki大约 5 年前

19 条评论

dbcurtis大约 5 年前
How antennas work, very high level:<p>1. Accelerate an electron, get a photon. A good transmitting antenna is something that is an efficient structure for accelerating electrons.<p>2. Antennas are reciprocal. They receive as well as they transmit.<p>3. Resonant structures are often used because you can keep more electrons accelerating with less energy -- the damp finger on the rim of a wine glass effect.<p>4. Power can be directed by appropriately phasing the radiating sub-structures to create constructive and destructive interference in the radiated energy.<p>The rest is modeled simply with a set of simultaneous three dimensional second-order partial differential equations.
评论 #22790033 未加载
评论 #22786930 未加载
评论 #22788828 未加载
评论 #22789453 未加载
spapas82大约 5 年前
One insight that may help non EE educated people understand what an antenna does: The simplest form of an antenna would be just a simple point emmiting electromagnetic waves. These waves would be transmitted all around that point distributed as sphere. All points of a sphere will have the same power. Now, an antenna has a different geometry than a point that helps somehow &quot;focus&quot; the EM waves, so their power is not distributed around the sphere uniformally but some directions get more power depending on the antenna design.<p>Now the thing to keep in mind is that an antenna is a passive device. It does amplify the signal but it does not add any power to it, it just collects the power to specific points. This may be easier to understand with a receiving antenna (which collects the signal).<p>For example, consider the satellite dish which is of course an antenna. Due to its design it should be conceptually easy to understand that the power of the transmitted field is all gathered in a very small area in the front of the dish. The largest the dish, the smaller the point where all the transmitted power is pointed, so less power would be needed to cover largest distances (and more difficult finding where the dish needs to point).
评论 #22787390 未加载
评论 #22787185 未加载
评论 #22791369 未加载
supernova87a大约 5 年前
One thing I have always struggled to understand about antennas --<p>Of course I know that an antenna is most efficient at radiating power when its length is some fraction&#x2F;multiple of the emitted wavelength. But I cannot for the life of me intuit how the electrons are being excited and behaving.<p>If I use the bathtub analogy of sloshing water, it cannot be (I believe) that the electrons are sloshing in bulk up and down the antenna and &quot;accumulating&quot; at one end at the speed of light.<p>On the other hand, if each electron along the length of the antenna is oscillating in its own relatively stable position, what then does the length matter to the electron at one end versus the other?<p>Or should I understand it as, energy is being transmitted out of the antenna, like it is in a flute being played, and the electrons are most constructively-interference being reinforced to resonate at the frequency desired (by standing waves in the conductor) if the length of the material matches the wavelength?<p>This has always been hard to visualize.
评论 #22789767 未加载
评论 #22788726 未加载
sizzzzlerz大约 5 年前
If you&#x27;re more interested in a practical approach to designing and building antennas for radios, find a recent copy of the ARRL Handbook, the source of information about ham radio. In it, you&#x27;ll find some theory, a little math, but mostly, how to build and deploy a wide variety of antennae to cover frequency ranges from 2 MHz to 10 GHz. They also offer a stand-alone book on nothing but antennas with more details and examples.
评论 #22787042 未加载
评论 #22819274 未加载
205guy大约 5 年前
This is a neat website Y an antenna engineer with lots cool info, but the big picture is buried. From that page, click on “antenna basics” then scroll all the way to the bottom where you can find “why do antennas radiate?”<p><a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.antenna-theory.com&#x2F;basics&#x2F;whyantennasradiate.php" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.antenna-theory.com&#x2F;basics&#x2F;whyantennasradiate.php</a><p>That answers the fundamental question of how antennas work.<p>Edit: looks like kawfey’s comment answered the issue already, I didn’t scroll down far enough: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22787249" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22787249</a>
degski大约 5 年前
The only thing not on the web-site is how antennas work, even in theory.
评论 #22787249 未加载
thelazydogsback大约 5 年前
I think the biggest take-away, that especially Hollywood needs to take note of, is what everyone gets wrong -- you don&#x27;t point a whip antenna <i>at</i> something to get the highest gain, you want to be at a right angle to the source. Remote controls often have the antenna oriented the wrong way for distance&#x2F;gain, and I&#x27;ve seen people orient wifi router antennas to &quot;point&quot; to usage areas, etc.
评论 #22787126 未加载
评论 #22786988 未加载
评论 #22787013 未加载
meonkeys大约 5 年前
Brace yourself for an onslaught of garish advertisements. If the content is truly exhaustive, a book would be a far better presentation format. I didn&#x27;t survive long enough to find out.
评论 #22786429 未加载
评论 #22786055 未加载
peter_d_sherman大约 5 年前
Excerpt:<p>&quot;Specifically, consider this statement: <i>Complexity is not a sign of intelligence; simplify. I have found this to a priceless amount of wisdom.</i>&quot;
amai大约 5 年前
Not complete without atomic antennas:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.technologyreview.com&#x2F;s&#x2F;611977&#x2F;get-ready-for-atomic-radio&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.technologyreview.com&#x2F;s&#x2F;611977&#x2F;get-ready-for-atom...</a>
dang大约 5 年前
A thread from 11 months ago: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=19708982" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=19708982</a><p>This topic is uncommon enough that we won&#x27;t call this a dupe (this came up yesterday: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22781498" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22781498</a>).
sunstone大约 5 年前
It&#x27;s mildly irritating that the concepts of explanations like this (and almost all others) are based on a false understanding, through the path loss equation and the law of reciprocity, of the underlying physics of antennas.<p>While this kind of approach allows for the proper engineering of antenna systems it is at least 50% wrong regarding the underlying physics.
brudgers大约 5 年前
some past comments, <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=19708982" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=19708982</a>
amelius大约 5 年前
Can somebody explain why I can send high definition video over WiFi, but not over an average quality USB 3 cable that is extended to a 6m length?
评论 #22789127 未加载
Causality1大约 5 年前
The full-justification formatting makes for some badly mutilated paragraphs when trying to read that site in portrait orientation.
humbfool2大约 5 年前
Recommended reading - Antenna Theory Analysis and Design, by Constantine Balanis
neves大约 5 年前
wow, I thought I would get some nice tips to position my wifi routers and repeaters antennas, but it too much information. Useful for who wants to get deep knowlegde, but I think I still need an easier guidance for my routers.
评论 #22787399 未加载
评论 #22786524 未加载
评论 #22787014 未加载
评论 #22786974 未加载
Avamander大约 5 年前
Had to turn the zoom to 66% to make it readable, yikes.
syphilis2大约 5 年前
Is there an index of all the pages on this site?