TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravity challenge (2003)

30 点作者 artur_makly大约 5 年前

5 条评论

pmyteh大约 5 年前
You might also enjoy a follow-up article of sorts, also published in the Christmas BMJ, reporting the results of an actual RCT on parachute use: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;doi.org&#x2F;10.1136&#x2F;bmj.k5094" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;doi.org&#x2F;10.1136&#x2F;bmj.k5094</a>
angel_j大约 5 年前
“We think that everyone might benefit if the most radical protagonists of evidence based medicine organised and participated in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of the parachute.”
dang大约 5 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22778832" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22778832</a> (I wonder why twice in two days?)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=18677508" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=18677508</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=4644463" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=4644463</a>
macintux大约 5 年前
My only question is why this wasn’t published on an April 1st.
评论 #22788505 未加载
echelon大约 5 年前
Parachutes solve a simple to model physics problem with few variables.<p>Vaccines or drugs are injected into an incredibly complicated biological system and interact with the immune system, cell signalling pathways, gene expression, thousands of different receptor bindings, and more.<p>For vaccines, the immune system itself is immeasurably complex. You can teach it the wrong things and be stuck with that lesson for life.<p>Interfering with signalling pathways can give you incurable cancer ten years down the line, or leave you with terrible disorders that ruin your quality of life.<p>How many times have drugs interfered with pregnancy and caused children to be born with birth defects and learning disorders? There&#x27;s a reason we study these things.<p>This analogy is a very poor fit.<p>Edit: why is this being downvoted? Are people really eager to try the new prophylactics? While designing a fix for Coronavirus is incredibly important, we can&#x27;t throw out all we know about safety. Why don&#x27;t you offer a counter argument so we can discuss?<p>Intervention in cases where it is obvious the patient won&#x27;t survive is worth considering, but we shouldn&#x27;t proactively give healthy people something we aren&#x27;t sure is safe.
评论 #22788561 未加载
评论 #22788454 未加载