TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Tesla Ventilator

162 点作者 ericzawo大约 5 年前

19 条评论

pdq大约 5 年前
Yes, this is an impressive amount of work done in a few weeks by a small team at Tesla. However, medical devices, especially for <i>life support</i> systems, are not a Hackathon project.<p>These devices breathe air into patients lungs. They need to be manufactured in clean room conditions, with medical grade parts, not plumbing parts from a big box store. They must be designed and tested to ISO specifications. If this fails, the patient can die.<p>I can&#x27;t imagine any hospital or doctor careless enough to connect one of these to a patient, even in this current emergency.<p>The smarter idea is to ramp up existing proven designs, not reinvent the wheel and basically do a publicity stunt about your engineering talent.
评论 #22794527 未加载
评论 #22794351 未加载
评论 #22794871 未加载
评论 #22794250 未加载
评论 #22794790 未加载
评论 #22794257 未加载
评论 #22794428 未加载
评论 #22794262 未加载
评论 #22794329 未加载
评论 #22794859 未加载
评论 #22794352 未加载
评论 #22795372 未加载
评论 #22794651 未加载
评论 #22794301 未加载
评论 #22797197 未加载
评论 #22794696 未加载
评论 #22794838 未加载
评论 #22794995 未加载
评论 #22803138 未加载
评论 #22794405 未加载
评论 #22795023 未加载
评论 #22794248 未加载
评论 #22794563 未加载
sschueller大约 5 年前
For more background info on what is needed for a ventilator and why it isn&#x27;t that simple: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22779665" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22779665</a>
评论 #22794001 未加载
评论 #22794139 未加载
评论 #22794835 未加载
LittleNemoInS大约 5 年前
This is not Tesla, but Seat has already done it : <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.seat.com&#x2F;company&#x2F;news&#x2F;company&#x2F;from-making-cars-to-ventilators.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.seat.com&#x2F;company&#x2F;news&#x2F;company&#x2F;from-making-cars-t...</a><p>Less techie, more down to earth, they used wipe motors.
评论 #22794668 未加载
评论 #22794476 未加载
评论 #22794590 未加载
nabla9大约 5 年前
Tesla didn&#x27;t do this from scratch as people here seem to assume.<p>Tesla partnered with Medtronic <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.medtronic.com&#x2F;us-en&#x2F;index.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.medtronic.com&#x2F;us-en&#x2F;index.html</a> It seems that they also work as parts supplier for Medtronic.
nsxwolf大约 5 年前
Are ventilators even helping? I see numbers like a 30% survival rate in some places, but they don&#x27;t mention if that means &quot;aren&#x27;t dead yet&quot; or recovered and removed from the ventilator. I definitely read about people who have successfully been removed and are recovering, but that&#x27;s all anecdotal.
评论 #22794384 未加载
评论 #22794879 未加载
评论 #22797221 未加载
zebrafish大约 5 年前
I&#x27;ll be interested to see how well they can scale this up. Production functions are always dependent on the most scare component. Hopefully Tesla can leverage their already existing supplier base to easily source everything needed for this design.
评论 #22793930 未加载
salvagedcircuit大约 5 年前
This is pretty excellent. It is one of the first ventilator solutions that actually implements appropriate air sensors, a PEEP function and air flow monitoring. Hats off to the tesla engineers for throwing this together so quickly. It&#x27;s pretty neat that so many car parts could be reused. I can imagine they are finalizing the software interface and optimizing the machining process to reduce the cut time on the custom manifold production. Again, awesome job guys!
gruez大约 5 年前
Are there certification requirements for newly designed ventilators? If so, how long would that take?
评论 #22794624 未加载
评论 #22794969 未加载
评论 #22794036 未加载
DubiousPusher大约 5 年前
The main criticism I see here is that without prolonged testing it&#x27;s very possible for a piece of equipment like this to do harm to a person.<p>On the other side I see people saying that for those that can&#x27;t get a ventilator and are going to die anyway, why not use it.<p>I&#x27;m curious if that category of patients exists though. With Covid are doctors able to make that call at any point? I&#x27;ve heard lot of Hail Mary treatments criticized because unlike in the movies there are many ailments where there&#x27;s not really a clear point where someone&#x27;s not coming back.<p>Anyone know if it&#x27;s a common scenario with this where a doctor knows someone is def going to die but there is still time left to do meaningful treatment?
gok大约 5 年前
The FDA would take years to approve a new ventilator that was an old one with a new paint color. A new design like this would probably be approved for use in US hospitals around 2025 if they&#x27;re lucky.<p>Might be useful sooner in a country with a more functional administrative state.
评论 #22797237 未加载
panpanna大约 5 年前
Not sure what to think of this.<p>Any people working with real medical ventilators care to comment on this?
评论 #22794122 未加载
评论 #22793958 未加载
detaro大约 5 年前
previously: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22789605" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=22789605</a>
DanBC大约 5 年前
This is good, and I&#x27;m glad they&#x27;re doing it.<p>They&#x27;ve clearly got involvement with existing ventilator manufacturers.<p>Are they talking to doctors in ITUs? Here&#x27;s a recent Facebook thread from people involved in London&#x27;s new hospital: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.facebook.com&#x2F;permalink.php?id=103930280957826&amp;story_fbid=217689892915197" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.facebook.com&#x2F;permalink.php?id=103930280957826&amp;st...</a><p>It shows that ventilation of covid-19 patients is not like ventilation of other patients.<p>I&#x27;ll paste part of it here because I know some can&#x27;t visit Facebook.<p>It&#x27;s by Daniel Martin OBE, Macintosh Professor of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Lead for High Consequence Infectious Diseases.<p>---everything below this point is a direct quote from Daniel Martin---<p>Ventilation<p>- Early high PEEP is probably not the right strategy and may be harmful. This is not ARDS in the early phase of the illness.<p>- Avoid spontaneous ventilation early in ICU admission as also may be harmful.<p>- There is clear microvascular thrombosis happening in the pulmonary circulation, which leads to an increased dead space.<p>- Also some evidence of early pulmonary fibrosis reported from Italy, possibly oxygen related, possibly inflammation related.<p>- Not many patients have reached extubation yet in London, re-intubation seems to be common. I highlighted our experiences of airway swelling &#x2F; stridor &#x2F; reintubation.<p>- Brompton are seeing wedge infarcts in the lungs on imaging, along with pulmonary thrombosis without DVT.<p>- Proning is essential and should be done early. Don’t just do it once. Threshold for many centres is a PF ratio of 13, but all agreed, do it even earlier.<p>- Early on in the disease, the benefit of proning lasts &lt; 4 hours when turned back to supine, as the disease progresses into a more ARDS type picture, the effect is more long lasting.<p>- Many centres using inhaled nitric oxide and prostacyclin with good effect. Tachyphylaxis with NO after 4-5 days.<p>- Generally people are using humidified circuits with HMEs.<p>- A very interesting thing they are doing at Georges is cohorting by phase of disease i.e. early, late, extubation &#x2F; trachy. It involves more moving of patients but helps each team to focus on things more easily.<p>- Leak test before extubation is crucial, others are also seeing airway swelling.<p>- Wait longer than usual before extubating, high reintubation rates reported. Do not extubatne if inflam markers still high.<p>My conclusions from this are:<p>- Less aggressive PEEP strategy at the beginning of the disease and go straight for proning.<p>- Thromboembolic disease is prevalent, look for it. No one is sure about whether we should anti-coagulate everyone, this is probably too risky.<p>- An extubation protocol is needed immediately.<p>- We should consider using inhaled prostacyclin again (like we previously did) as it seems to be working early in the disease.
yoda_sl大约 5 年前
Extremely curious the outcome... I hope they can get some folks in the medical field to provide quickly some feedback.
评论 #22793945 未加载
vernie大约 5 年前
Is this like the kid-size submarine or does it have a chance of being mass-produced?
评论 #22794626 未加载
Beltiras大约 5 年前
I just took possession of a Model 3 about 2 weeks ago. Feel like I underpaid for it when seeing how some of the residuals are being used now.
m4tthumphrey大约 5 年前
I just love the environment in the video! It looks like they&#x27;re all in college experimenting! Loving the rowdy shirts and leather jackets!
vorpalhex大约 5 年前
This looks promising. They&#x27;re being smart to use their own supply chain as much as possible, but obviously things will get interesting when it comes to getting clearance to deploy the device. Even if the design can&#x27;t be used in it&#x27;s entirety, they may be able to fill part of the supply chain for other manufacturers.<p>One complaint - everyone keeps touching their damned masks. Keep your booger picker away from your face.
评论 #22794028 未加载
ProAm大约 5 年前
Hopefully they get these right instead of ordering C-PAP machines [1]<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.forbes.com&#x2F;sites&#x2F;billroberson&#x2F;2020&#x2F;04&#x2F;04&#x2F;health-officials-say-ventilators-donated-by-tesla-are-wrong-type-and-not-powerful-enough&#x2F;#1554fae56264" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.forbes.com&#x2F;sites&#x2F;billroberson&#x2F;2020&#x2F;04&#x2F;04&#x2F;health-...</a>
评论 #22794073 未加载
评论 #22794043 未加载