It would have been nice to see a bit more inclusion of what was happening in the Americas during this same period, since they were already fairly populated. He also mentions the impact of Bubonic plague, but neglects to mention the early initial impact of smallpox in the Americas - some estimates are that it killed roughly 10% of all human life on the planet in less than 100 years.<p>>"Our new data-driven best estimate is a death toll of 56 million by the beginning of the 1600s — 90 percent of the pre-Columbian Indigenous population and around 10 percent of the global population at the time. This makes the “Great Dying” the largest human mortality event in proportion to the global population, putting it second in absolute terms only to World War II, in which 80 million people died — 3% of the world’s population at the time."<p><a href="https://www.pri.org/stories/2019-01-31/european-colonization-americas-killed-10-percent-world-population-and-caused" rel="nofollow">https://www.pri.org/stories/2019-01-31/european-colonization...</a><p>Given that the "discovery" of the "New World" was a pivotal feature of the period alluded to in the article, the fact that it had just been massively depopulated and was then taken over by new settlers seems hugely relevant to a "long view on globalization".<p>In addition, there is good evidence that agriculture was independently invented in the Americas, in addition to its advent in the fertile crescent and early china.