To put this in perspective, it has happened before along similar lines in different produce types.<p>For example, almost all of the vineyards in Europe were wiped out in the 19th century [1]. This is why the oldest vineyards in the world are somewhere in South America. (I think Chile?)<p>Today, as we all know, France is still the most important wine producing country. South Africa has 100k hectares of wine; France has 100k hectares <i>of merlot</i>.<p>Yes, people can do more to handle these diseases, but often the simplest way is with a lot of poison, which many people also don't like. <i>Tuta absoluta</i> wiped out 1/2 of the yearly Egyptian tomato crop few years ago and yet it's pretty similar to what we call <i>aartappelmot</i> and unfortunately the way to handle it is with a lot of poison.<p>By the way, this is why I emphasise that policy is not the main issue in agriculture. The issue is efficiency and efficacy. For example, I am working on building a system that improves time of application of pesticides. (Before getting there, there are some lower hanging fruit to pick.) It's a major problem for farmers of all sizes as the people selling the pesticides actually have an incentive to get you to buy more and more. But the key is to apply at the right stage of the particular pest's life cycle. And as someone who likes mathematics, it's satisfying work due to the inherent complexity of agriculture.<p>[1] I think this is the one we're looking for: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_French_Wine_Blight" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_French_Wine_Blight</a>