TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Our Long Bets and Predictions about 02020

164 点作者 another大约 5 年前

13 条评论

jnbiche大约 5 年前
Not sure why they&#x27;re so quick to write off Long Bet #9. It&#x27;s highly likely we&#x27;ll reach 1,000,000 worldwide casualties from Covid-19 during a 6-month period before the end of year (defined in the bet&#x27;s terms as &quot;hospitalizations&quot;).<p>And if the hypothesis turns out to be true that it was an accidental release from one of Wuhan&#x27;s 2 laboratories doing bat virus research, that&#x27;s definitely a &quot;bioerror&quot; under the terms of the bet.<p>There&#x27;s significant circumstantial evidence it could have been a lab accident(early Chinese reporting about the index case, 1 lab location a few blocks away from seafood market, bat species, earlier lab accident, etc), but nothing more at this point. But we may know more by the end of the year.<p>Edit: This is <i>not</i> the wild conspiracy theory about a bioengineered virus in a weapons lab. This is a hypothesis about accidental bat pee on a lab worker conducting routine research, or some similar accident (such accidental releases are confirmed to have happened <i>twice</i> with SARS-Cov-1 virus in a Beijing lab). Laboratory-acquired infections do happen, sometimes with deadly consequences. In my mind, it&#x27;s the most feasible scenario at this point, given no one has provided proof that bats were even sold at the seafood market that was blamed. And we know that many officials were eager to cover this all up.
评论 #22913917 未加载
评论 #22913354 未加载
评论 #22913748 未加载
评论 #22913880 未加载
评论 #22914315 未加载
评论 #22913571 未加载
评论 #22913759 未加载
评论 #22914223 未加载
评论 #22913497 未加载
评论 #22914165 未加载
评论 #22913978 未加载
diebeforei485大约 5 年前
&gt; By &quot;bioerror&quot;, I mean something which has the same effect as a terror attack, but rises from inadvertance rather than evil intent. [1]<p>It&#x27;s not clear that covid-19 isn&#x27;t bioerror. There is a lot of information[2] pointing in that direction, so I wouldn&#x27;t dismiss the theory outright the way the OP authors did. In any case it hasn&#x27;t killed a million people.<p>1. <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;longbets.org&#x2F;9&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;longbets.org&#x2F;9&#x2F;</a><p>2. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;project-evidence.github.io" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;project-evidence.github.io</a>
评论 #22914643 未加载
评论 #22913258 未加载
评论 #22913371 未加载
emptybits大约 5 年前
Impressive prescience over 27 years ago:<p>&quot;&quot;&quot;Precocious associate editor and columnist for the Daily Telegraph, 32-year-old [Boris] Johnson has been called the &quot;rising star of the write, not right&quot;. After indulging his taste for politics and intrigue as president of the Oxford Union, Boris exercised his &quot;belief in freedom&quot; as a journalist, Eurobashing and penning paeans to British &quot;ordinariness&quot;. Not shy in clashing with party lines, Boris would &quot;renegotiate EU membership so Britain stands to Europe as Canada, not Texas, stands to the USA&quot;. Pericles, state-builder and negotiator of Athenian autonomy, is his hero.&quot;&quot;&quot;[1] (February 1997)<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.independent.co.uk&#x2F;arts-entertainment&#x2F;the-cabinet-of-tomorrow-1277684.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.independent.co.uk&#x2F;arts-entertainment&#x2F;the-cabinet...</a>
评论 #22914600 未加载
评论 #22913506 未加载
JimDabell大约 5 年前
&gt; 75% of all incremental new generation will come from renewable&#x2F;sustainable energy in the U.S.<p>&gt; Predictor: Jigar Shah.<p>&gt; Prediction Duration: 16 years (02004–02020).<p>&gt; Did the Prediction Come True? Yes — 76%, in fact.<p>&gt; In January, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) said it expected 76% of new electric generating capacity to come from wind and solar in 02020.<p>What‽ You can&#x27;t confirm a prediction has come true by citing another prediction!
zamalek大约 5 年前
&gt; The technology will exist that will allow for the “faxing” (teleportation- sending&#x2F;receiving) of actual inanimate objects, such as text books, clothing, jewelry and the like.<p>This one has two possible outcomes. Faxing is cloning, not teleportation - so the parentheses are contradictory. We can definitely fax 3D inanimate objects (3D scanning, email and 3D printing).
评论 #22913486 未加载
评论 #22913417 未加载
评论 #22913303 未加载
cl3m大约 5 年前
12020 is better than 02020 (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=czgOWmtGVGs" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=czgOWmtGVGs</a>, <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Holocene_calendar" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Holocene_calendar</a>)
11thEarlOfMar大约 5 年前
Here is the original 10,000 year clock proposal, Danny Hillis with Wired Magazine:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;1995&#x2F;12&#x2F;the-millennium-clock&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;1995&#x2F;12&#x2F;the-millennium-clock&#x2F;</a>
评论 #22913691 未加载
评论 #22913526 未加载
lozaning大约 5 年前
Can someone explain to me the reason for including a leading zero? Is that just a stylist choice of the long now foundation?
评论 #22913235 未加载
评论 #22913208 未加载
评论 #22913173 未加载
评论 #22913216 未加载
评论 #22913182 未加载
评论 #22913151 未加载
vagab0nd大约 5 年前
Tangential: I wish we had open betting&#x2F;prediction markets for everything. At the risk of being naive, I had this idea of matching speculators with insurance buyers on a platform. Example: If I&#x27;m hosting an outdoor event in 2 days and I want to hedge against it raining on that day, I can buy insurance (bet against sunny) and get paid if it rains. Speculators can make money by selling insurance. Sort of like options trading but for real world events. Does this exist? Is it even legal?
评论 #22920923 未加载
ekianjo大约 5 年前
&gt; In 02004, futurist Ray Kurzweil predicted that food consumption would be on the wane, as “billions of tiny nanobots in the digestive tract and bloodstream could intelligently extract the precise nutrients we require.”<p>Love the fact that Kurzweil is still somewhat taken seriously considering how poor his track record has been.
longtermd大约 5 年前
They made a Mistake at Teleportation: &quot;The technology will exist that will allow for the “faxing” (teleportation- sending&#x2F;receiving) of actual inanimate objects, such as text books, clothing, jewelry and the like.&quot;<p>This is TRUE, and can be easily done with 3D printers. Note that &quot;faxing&quot; by definition is not &quot;teleportation&quot;, but &quot;copying at a different location&quot;, which is exactly what 3D printing is.
stewbrew大约 5 年前
Which year are they talking about? Is this an octal number?
评论 #22914225 未加载
评论 #22915594 未加载
dmos62大约 5 年前
I guess 01997 is better than 1.99.7.