Their core argument seems to be that we should place less value on those dying from Coronavirus, because most of them "would soon have died anyway" - and more value on the percieved economic risk of the lockdowns, because this somehow represents "the people we can see dying in front of us".<p>Hence easing the lockdown, focusing on the economy and just letting the virus take its course whould naturally be the more "humane" solution...<p>Seems like a classic right-wing trolley-problem exercise which is really a thinly-veiled excuse to lobby for social darwinism.