TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Red Hat: 'Yes, we undercut Oracle with hidden Linux patches'

25 点作者 tuxychandru超过 14 年前

2 条评论

chalst超过 14 年前
Quoting Russ Herold from the article: <i>Nothing in Red Hat's new approach prevents a person from running a local version-control system, containing the pristine kernel at point A, and the Red Hat variant which we might call point B. Then one runs a 'diff' in that version-control system between A and B, and starts reading the diffs to see what is happening. Over time, both the pristine kernel, and the patched Red Hat versions will vary, and one will get a sense for which 'diff' parts matter, and which are cosmetic cleanups.</i><p>This actually sounds labour intensive.<p>From the Centos mailing list, Johnny Hughes writes: <i>That is not to say I like the changes, as it will have impacts ... but as long as they only do it to the kernel, it is not a big problem.</i><p><a href="http://www.linux-archive.org/centos/497467-will-centos-become-obsolete-now-because-changes-red-hat-implementing.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.linux-archive.org/centos/497467-will-centos-becom...</a>
pessimizer超过 14 年前
I wish I could say that I don't think this is compatible with the GPL, simply because I don't like it, but I can't. This seems like a good move for their bottom line. It'll suck for CentOS users though.
评论 #2292491 未加载
评论 #2292537 未加载
评论 #2292767 未加载
评论 #2292600 未加载