TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

This must be Google's Facebook clone. It sure looks like it.

209 点作者 aj700大约 14 年前

20 条评论

citricsquid大约 14 年前
I don't think google will ever win at social, every site that started small changed and adapted to what the users wanted, google can't do that, they launch a new site and bam millions of users instantly; yet all these users want different things, so instead of shaping the experience around what they need to <i>get</i> users (what Facebook did) they're catering to what they <i>think</i> will retain users. They have to find out what users want without the access to "organic" information, market research is proven time and time again to be worthless.<p>The problem of getting users is often one that defines a site, when you don't have that problem it becomes a battle to stop users leaving to better more "mature" pastures. I think the next big social site (if there ever is one) will be a no-name small-gone-big site, but even then with how everyone (users) is about social now (they want to be instantly in on the next big thing) I doubt that can happen. I think that maybe Facebook is the end of social sites, which feels strange and ridiculous to say, but maybe.<p>Google will never "get" social, there is nothing <i>to</i> get.<p>Edit: in fact I think a great example of this is Google Wave. It was a fantastic product for a variety of tasks, project management was one, yet Google pitched it as the "next big thing" to users so they all joined with ridiculous expectations of what it was and wasn't and now look what happened... Tumblr is another great example in the other direction, what the site is now is very community orientated, yet from the interviews I've seen with the founder (David something) it didn't seem as if this was intention from the get go, yet users used the site like that and so they adapted and enabled users to use it like that. Now look, they're <i>huge</i>. Does anyone know of any products launched by big companies (Google, Microsoft etc.) that did go big? I can't think of any off hand, would be interesting to look at how they grew and developed.
评论 #2295221 未加载
评论 #2295286 未加载
评论 #2295228 未加载
评论 #2295967 未加载
评论 #2296350 未加载
评论 #2295860 未加载
评论 #2296321 未加载
评论 #2296863 未加载
评论 #2295207 未加载
评论 #2296600 未加载
seancron大约 14 年前
No, it's the updated Google Profiles as discussed previously: <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2282094" rel="nofollow">http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2282094</a> (<a href="http://googlesocialweb.blogspot.com/2011/03/decide-what-world-sees-when-it-searches.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlesocialweb.blogspot.com/2011/03/decide-what-worl...</a>)<p>And as I said in the previous discussion, the reason profile pages tend to use the same layout is because it's an established design pattern now. People already know what to expect when they see a page with that layout.
评论 #2295041 未加载
paolomaffei大约 14 年前
If the headline "Decide what the world sees when it searches for you." means that when someone search a name+surname profiles.google.com will always be top I see this as quite powerful!
评论 #2295011 未加载
supervillain大约 14 年前
Google's ubiquitous and omnipresent ways of doing things will win it's way on social.<p>It's kinda crude, but I think Google's plan is to make Google Profile (aka Facebook clone) ubiquitous and omnipresent blurring the line going to a social networking site and just searching for that person.<p>Kinda like Microsoft's thing with Windows 98 when everything can be used as Internet Explorer.
评论 #2301049 未加载
rome大约 14 年前
The reason I don't use Google profiles is that I have no reason to. A public facing, Facebook like site? No thanks.<p>I wasn't interested in Facebook until a real life friend from another state invited me. That's Facebook's draw for me; interaction with real friends and family.
andrewcooke大约 14 年前
public profiles have existed for a long time. this isn't new.
评论 #2294976 未加载
farlington大约 14 年前
I logged in to check out my own, ancient Google profile (which I just about barely set up—bare minimum of info and hadn't logged in since the day I'd heard of it) to discover that has a picture in it that I'd never given Google permission to use. I'm sure they got it from Adium (I use gchat with Adium), but I found it creepy to have my profile given a picture without my knowledge or permission.
评论 #2297215 未加载
yaix大约 14 年前
Google is for search. That's what people know.<p>As long as Google published apps under their Google brand, they will not fly.<p>The popular servics Google has (Blogger, YouTube, etc) run all under their own brand.<p>If Google seriously wants to make a social network, it must run under its own brand/domain. And they should give it a little more attention than they did with Orkut.<p>I don't think the problem it Google not "getting" the "social". Its about not creating a distinguishable brand. Google is search.
ph0rque大约 14 年前
Now if only I could import my downloaded facebook info into there...
yr大约 14 年前
Is it not a terrible name "Google Profiles" for facebook killer ?
aj700大约 14 年前
I posted this because I was shocked by how facebook-like it is. The buzz tab is there if buzz is enabled it seems. You prob have to turn it off entirely to kill the tab.<p>I turned buzz off the day it launched. So I was more surprised that it now look exactly like a facebook wall.<p>Some nice differences. You don't have to choose between male and female. But the relationship field has the same choices. Sadly, there is still no "X is currently shagging | fucking | etc Y" option. That's more like what I want to say. Pick your own damn transitive verb.<p>It's got the lame and prudish "X is in a relationship with Y" as ever.
missinglink大约 14 年前
I think "decide what the world sees when it searches for you" is a very good concept. You can expose yourself without having to worry about privacy. I wouldn't want to make my Facebook profile available to everyone.
simonh大约 14 年前
The problem is Google isn't hungry. They don't make these things work because they don't have to. AdSense will always put food on the table, so they don't have the sense of urgency to fix this. It's a common problem for companies that already have a cash cow and then try to develop or acquire secondary services, e.g. Yahoo with Delicious. They don't have the sense of urgency, executive focus and the commitment to make them work.
评论 #2295296 未加载
lazylland大约 14 年前
I think they should have gone for an about.me/flavors.me presentation . If anything, just to pull away from the facebook look.
评论 #2295464 未加载
jgalvez大约 14 年前
In Brazil, it was translated as "Google Perfis". Bad bad bad. Facebook is a single brand across all countries. Google should keep a single brand as well, even "Google Profiles" would be better than "Google Profiles" translated in every language possible.
aik大约 14 年前
My Buzz tab was completely public by default. That's annoying.
评论 #2295342 未加载
mapster大约 14 年前
Facebook already serves as a personal wiki for name searches. Will Google rank Google profiles higher than Facebook results for a given name?
hoag大约 14 年前
Speaking of which, has anybody tried google.com/health? Or how about the cool WebGL-powered site bodybrowser.googlelabs.com?
there大约 14 年前
i thought orkut was google's facebook clone?
评论 #2295161 未加载
zaidf大约 14 年前
Do I see a "Buzz" tab?<p><i>shakeshead</i>
评论 #2294982 未加载