TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

FCC must reveal IP addresses and user-agent headers of net neutrality commenters

414 点作者 arunbahl大约 5 年前

11 条评论

ogre_codes大约 5 年前
&gt; Second, the FCC objects to producing the relevant materials from the API proxy server log because to do so requires creating a script, which demands &quot;research&quot; rather than simply a &quot;search.&quot;<p>Funny how a government agency considers it overly burdensome to write what is likely a 4 line script, so goes through a lawsuit that costs taxpayers likely millions of dollars to avoid it. Unless their infrastructure is well and truly F*ed, this is a 30-60 minute task for a junior server admin. Most likely they already ran it and didn&#x27;t like what it revealed so it&#x27;s even less effort.
评论 #23073297 未加载
评论 #23074779 未加载
评论 #23075800 未加载
评论 #23073266 未加载
评论 #23074604 未加载
评论 #23074573 未加载
评论 #23076532 未加载
tengbretson大约 5 年前
I fully understand both the cases for and against having net neutrality rules. However, I cannot for the life of me understand why a bunch of comments on a website has somehow become the battleground where this is being fought. What is going on here? As far as I can tell, the comments have about as much sway on public policy as the average youtube comment – none whatsoever.
评论 #23073270 未加载
评论 #23073169 未加载
评论 #23073105 未加载
评论 #23073127 未加载
评论 #23073108 未加载
评论 #23073155 未加载
评论 #23073226 未加载
评论 #23075842 未加载
评论 #23074926 未加载
评论 #23073201 未加载
评论 #23075328 未加载
评论 #23074756 未加载
gigatexal大约 5 年前
When his run at the FCC ends I think history will remember Pai as the big telco tool that he is. His leadership (sic) at the FCC has been appalling. I can’t wait for him to be gone so that, hopefully, the damage can be repaired by someone else.
评论 #23075262 未加载
评论 #23074099 未加载
评论 #23074025 未加载
not2b大约 5 年前
I don&#x27;t think the FCC&#x27;s pushback is based on lack of competence or inability to write simple scripts. That&#x27;s just what they are trying to fool the courts with. I think they are covering up, because Pai knows where a lot of the fake comments came from: the sources of the fake comments will be discovered, and it will look bad for the industry when it comes out.
TazeTSchnitzel大约 5 年前
&gt; IP addresses and User-Agent headers<p>I expect the NYT will just find thousands of comments written with IE6 from AWS IP addresses.
评论 #23073150 未加载
natch大约 5 年前
Aren’t they also the agency giving the green light to massive violations of consumer privacy by allowing ISPs to data warehouse and monetize browsing histories? And they have the nerve to claim that they want to keep IP addresses private in just this one case where it benefits themselves.
paypalcust83大约 5 年前
Next, they&#x27;ll require IDs and use IVRC to delete comments based on &quot;too similar names.&quot;
adamleithp大约 5 年前
It would be hilarious and ever maddening if the user agent came back as &quot;Puppeteer&quot; and IP came back ::0<p>Can&#x27;t wait to see it.
panny大约 5 年前
I hope the NYT posts a copy of the data for public inspection.
mschuster91大约 5 年前
How do they still have all this data? Under GDPR (yes, it&#x27;s European, I know) after a reasonable amount of time (=14 days) you gotta delete all the PII out of the logs. Does US law really allow storing mostly irrelevant logs for so long, and who pays for storing them?
评论 #23075312 未加载
评论 #23075994 未加载
评论 #23078361 未加载
评论 #23075222 未加载
bluedays大约 5 年前
How long will it take for this information to mysteriously go missing?
评论 #23074275 未加载