TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Those litigious men in their flying machines

44 点作者 smacktoward大约 5 年前

8 条评论

WalterBright大约 5 年前
Patents have generally failed in their intended purpose. Edison probably spent half his career in court:<p>1. being sued for patent infringement<p>2. suing others for patent infringement<p>3. being hired by companies to find workarounds for other patents<p>4. being an expert witness in a patent case<p>The patent system should be abolished.
评论 #23207768 未加载
评论 #23206983 未加载
评论 #23207784 未加载
评论 #23208909 未加载
errantmind大约 5 年前
The patent system should be abolished. Here are a number of (convincing) arguments which refute the central premises of the patent system: &quot;The Case Against Patents&quot; : <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;files.stlouisfed.org&#x2F;files&#x2F;htdocs&#x2F;wp&#x2F;2012&#x2F;2012-035.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;files.stlouisfed.org&#x2F;files&#x2F;htdocs&#x2F;wp&#x2F;2012&#x2F;2012-035.p...</a>
thyrsus大约 5 年前
The title aludes to the movie titled &quot;Those Magnificent Men In Their Flying Machines&quot;, a comedy I found entertaining both as a child and adult: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Those_Magnificent_Men_in_their_Flying_Machines" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.m.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Those_Magnificent_Men_in_the...</a>
perilunar大约 5 年前
Interestingly Lawrence Hargrave, the Australian aviation pioneer, opposed patents:<p>&quot;Workers must root out the idea [that] by keeping the results of their labours to themselves[,] a fortune will be assured to them. Patent fees are much wasted money. The flying machine of the future will not be born fully fledged and capable of a flight for 1000 miles or so. Like everything else it must be evolved gradually. The first difficulty is to get a thing that will fly at all. When this is made, a full description should be published as an aid to others. Excellence of design and workmanship will always defy competition.&quot;
_bxg1大约 5 年前
It would be interesting if, instead of a patent meaning &quot;you can do whatever you want including preventing anyone from doing anything with this at all, if you so please&quot;, it only meant &quot;you get X% royalties from anything anyone makes with this, but they are otherwise free to make those things&quot;.
peter_d_sherman大约 5 年前
&quot;Intellectual property protection and national security have long been intertwined. For as long as espionage has existed, spies and agents have tried to steal and copy foreign technology.&quot;<p>What I want to know is:<p><i>&quot;Which country copied&#x2F;stole&#x2F;appropriated (use whatever languaging makes you feel comfortable) the wheel from which other country, first?&quot;</i> &lt;g&gt;<p>&quot;Intellectual Property Theft&quot;, you gotta love it...<p>It&#x27;s amazing, because all of Silicon Valley stands on the shoulders of pioneers; on the shoulders of giants, but not once in those silly interviews of the latest successful founder, who&#x27;s only a kid, do they ever, ever <i>thank all of the people that made all of the infrastructure</i> that made their present day business able to function... people including, but not limited to: Boole, Tesla, Turing, Shannon, Von Neumann, Atanasoff, and others too numerous to count.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_pioneers_in_computer_science" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;List_of_pioneers_in_computer_s...</a><p>Also, most so-called intellectual property &quot;secrets&quot; -- usually appear in some form or other in academic papers <i>way before they are snapped up and patented by some multinational company</i>, some multinational company who is usually not the original researcher or researchers.<p>Which brings me to another other point... usually the multinational company profits more, way more, orders of magnitude more, than the original inventors&#x2F;researchers, who might not (in some but not all cases) be compensated at all...<p>So now the next question is, <i>who stole what from whom, when?</i><p>a) Did some other country, i.e., China (or whoever) steal intellectual property from another &quot;Country&quot; (which are actually corporations&#x2F;corporate interests in that other country)?<p>or<p>b) Did the corporation that was &quot;stole from&quot; -- steal that intellectual property from the original inventors&#x2F;researchers? (You know, via legal means, paying someone a pittance and calling it a &quot;fair deal&quot; is still stealing...)<p>or<p>c) Did the original inventors&#x2F;researchers steal their idea from ideas that were already floating about in the academic community and in previous academic papers, in that field of study?<p><i>Who stole what from who, when?</i><p>?<p>That&#x27;s what I want to know.<p>And I also want to know which country stole the wheel from which other country, first... &lt;g&gt;
_0ffh大约 5 年前
There&#x27;s Stephan Kinsella&#x27;s point once again.
Animats大约 5 年前
In a post-patent world, success is driven by the ability to blow large sums of money buying market share. We were lucky to have an era where there was enough venture capital to do that. Thank Softbank and the Saudi Arabia Sovereign Wealth Fund for being the suckers who made that possible.<p>In Silicon Valley, up until about 2000, venture capitalists wanted a strong patent position before funding something. As a group, VCs made money from the 1970s to 2000 or so. In the 2000s, with the push for growth, failures cost more and VCs, as a group, lost money. Not sure about the 2010s.