TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Programmer Competency Matrix

77 点作者 spydez将近 17 年前

10 条评论

huhtenberg将近 17 年前
This sort of summaries always leave me with an impression of being written by someone about himself and a few guys in his epsilon neighborhood.<p>Realistically speaking, you've gotta be not just an über-programmer, but having extensive exposure to the HR and developer management to have any credibility on the matter. Otherwise the statistical sample is just not there, so the list has very little value outside of being entertaining.<p>A concrete gripe with this particular matrix - maintaining a blog has <i>nothing</i> to do with programmer's <i>competency</i>. In fact the exact opposite is true based on my observations. The reference to the value of TopCoder rankings is also laughable at best; again based on my own experience.
评论 #233498 未加载
评论 #232792 未加载
评论 #233089 未加载
评论 #232825 未加载
ajross将近 17 年前
Uh... what conceivable purpose can this have? Bragging rights? Or is the intent that someone checks this stuff off and decides to only hire "log(n) level 3 competent programmers"?<p>Guess I'd better get to work finding professional experience in prolog, and write some custom macros for the IDEs I don't use. Yikes, I'm falling behind...
评论 #232555 未加载
评论 #232458 未加载
评论 #232532 未加载
评论 #232379 未加载
edw519将近 17 年前
Hilarious! I think I saw someone I knew in every box.<p>I would change the IDE &#38; log(n) (Level 3) intersection from "Has Written Macros" to "Doesn't Use Them". Real programmers don't use training wheels.
评论 #232692 未加载
评论 #232563 未加载
评论 #232465 未加载
Tichy将近 17 年前
Is Prolog still relevant? I am still curious about it, but never got round to checking it out.
Hexstream将近 17 年前
The "<i>languages with professional experience</i>" and "<i>languages exposed to</i>" rows are duplicates, is it a bug or a feature?<p>I'm apparently level 1, in 13 years (I'll be 35) I should be a decent programmer.
评论 #233239 未加载
johnyzee将近 17 年前
Entire sections are missing, f.ex. process. Others are naive, f.ex. build automation (no continuous integration?).<p>Obviously skewed toward geekery (he is the Indian geek after all).
PieSquared将近 17 年前
Um... Why did someone downmod every single comment on this page?
评论 #232575 未加载
PieSquared将近 17 年前
I find myself to be mostly in the 3rd column, and sometimes in the fourth. This just gave me some specifics of what to focus on. What columns are you people at?
评论 #233060 未加载
评论 #232404 未加载
ardit33将近 17 年前
3rd column all the way. Not bad, but there is still room for improvment.
staticshock将近 17 年前
could someone comment on why files should have license headers (code organization within a file)? i'm not clear on the idea there, so i'd like to know more.
评论 #232673 未加载