TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

The Atlantic lays off almost 20% of staff

218 点作者 augustocallejas大约 5 年前

16 条评论

jbellis大约 5 年前
85 comments and not one seems to have read past the headline here.<p>&quot;The 68 staff cuts are mostly attributable to the collapse of the company&#x27;s events business.&quot;<p>Reporters aren&#x27;t losing their jobs here. Events staff with no events to run are.
评论 #23265570 未加载
评论 #23265507 未加载
GnarfGnarf大约 5 年前
The sum of annual subscriptions across all newspapers I&#x27;m interested in is exorbitant.<p>What if I could pay on a per-article basis? I wouldn&#x27;t have a problem paying 50¢ or $1.00 for an article I was interested in. It&#x27;s not practical for each publisher to set up micro-payments. But, if there were an intermediate agent that accepted and managed payments for individual random articles, the money could be aggregated and remitted in a lump sum to the publishers. Sort of like an old-fashioned news stand.<p>What the newspaper business needs is a middleman who will collect micro-payments from me and millions of others, aggregate the money, charge my credit card once a month, and pay each publication weekly or monthly for the collective readers who have selected articles.<p>The middleman could accept PayPal payments, or I could open an account with my credit card, and pay once a month for all the individual articles I have read.<p>There is a Website called Blendle that proposes to do this. However, only a subset of articles are available. Publishers are reserving the prime content for full subscribers, and leaving Blendle with the crumbs. That&#x27;s not going to work.
评论 #23265473 未加载
评论 #23265177 未加载
评论 #23265452 未加载
评论 #23265448 未加载
评论 #23265310 未加载
评论 #23265125 未加载
评论 #23265199 未加载
评论 #23265479 未加载
评论 #23265676 未加载
评论 #23265350 未加载
评论 #23265174 未加载
评论 #23265235 未加载
评论 #23265146 未加载
评论 #23265508 未加载
评论 #23265269 未加载
评论 #23265258 未加载
评论 #23267593 未加载
评论 #23265127 未加载
burkaman大约 5 年前
&gt; Between the lines: The Atlantic&#x27;s new majority ownership stake from Emerson Collective, the impact investment vehicle owned by Laurene Powell Jobs, has allowed the company to accelerate its growth in recent years, including a major staff increase and expansion that began in 2018.<p>&quot;Emerson Collective is a social change organization that uses a broad range of tools including philanthropy, impact investing, and policy solutions to create the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Established and led by Laurene Powell Jobs, Emerson Collective is working to renew some of society’s most calcified systems, creating new possibilities for individuals, families, and communities.&quot;<p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.emersoncollective.com&#x2F;about-us&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.emersoncollective.com&#x2F;about-us&#x2F;</a><p>Laurene Powell Jobs has ~$22 billion. She could pay the salaries of these 68 employees for the next 10 years if she felt like it without noticing a change in her bank account.<p>Obviously she is not obligated to do anything, but if employees of my &quot;social change organization&quot; that were hired under my watch, with my encouragement, were impacted by a possibly temporary economic downturn in the middle of a global pandemic and I could help them without sacrificing anything, I hope I would.
评论 #23264635 未加载
评论 #23264702 未加载
评论 #23264709 未加载
评论 #23265195 未加载
评论 #23268050 未加载
评论 #23265648 未加载
评论 #23265378 未加载
minimaxir大约 5 年前
As noted in the Vice layoffs thread a week ago (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=23193140" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=23193140</a>), these industry layoffs are a function of revenue pipelines, and it is 100% not related to the type of content or political leanings.
评论 #23264270 未加载
alistproducer2大约 5 年前
This sucks. The Atlantic was doing great reporting in the beginning of corona, pointing out how few tests were.being done. It was necessary work that reminded me how important real journalism is.
评论 #23266033 未加载
评论 #23264970 未加载
评论 #23265299 未加载
评论 #23264669 未加载
shortformblog大约 5 年前
Their subscription model is strange—it’s $49 per year, which isn’t a lot, but it FEELS like a lot because there is no monthly option like most publications.<p>But events are a huge portion of business for pubs like The Atlantic. It is sad to see these cuts though because they are really putting out some of the most important thinking around this crisis right now, cutting stuff that digs beneath the surface and highlights the broader trends at play.
nojito大约 5 年前
Real Journalism is very expensive.<p>I fear the day when all the financially viable &quot;news&quot; is some YouTube channel with no investigative staff powering it, but caters to a niche that doesn&#x27;t care about accuracy or integrity to sustain itself.
评论 #23265167 未加载
blaser-waffle大约 5 年前
Events? I would have guesses ad revenue -- it&#x27;s tanking most places.
评论 #23264376 未加载
sunstone大约 5 年前
Why don&#x27;t the magazines get together and offer a package deal? Kind of like cable but for print media. I know Apple has something like that but I&#x27;m not an Appostle. If I could pick the publications I want I would be on that in a heartbeat.
zwieback大约 5 年前
It&#x27;s my fault - I let my print subscription lapse because someone gave me their free New Yorker gift subscription. I didn&#x27;t feel like I could keep up with both plus the Atlantic RSS feed still has a lot of good stuff for free.
mmhsieh大约 5 年前
what is really the minimally-functional enterprise size for a journalistic organization? you need reporters, editors and fact-checkers. that is the atlantic model. or, if you want just reporters, we can have pure indy reporting on massive platforms where it is a pure marketplace of ideas. the future does not appear to favor the atlantic model.
评论 #23265450 未加载
tengbretson大约 5 年前
I guess I would have assumed that these positions would all have been furloughed months ago since I don&#x27;t imagine very many of them fit the qualification of &quot;essential&quot;
评论 #23264896 未加载
bryanmgreen大约 5 年前
I hope this isn&#x27;t indicative of larger business troubles.<p>They&#x27;ve provided some of the most quality editorial over the years.<p>Thankfully John Oliver, podcasts, paid individual-contributor newsletters, and documentaries are taking over long-form investigative journalism and news-aggregator sites and social media are increasing their reach, but I still feel there&#x27;s value in &quot;traditional&quot; editorial institutions.
ProAm大约 5 年前
I cant view the article, is there a way around the paywall?
评论 #23264348 未加载
jasonv大约 5 年前
I&#x27;m surprised how much rationalization towards the billionaire class is being employed to reason against sympathy and sustenance for the working class individuals impacted by this.<p>The billionaires have all the advantages, and often hold a moral and political posture that they promote socially that are at odds with these actions.
评论 #23265461 未加载
评论 #23265091 未加载
评论 #23265561 未加载
评论 #23265945 未加载
评论 #23264845 未加载
评论 #23265332 未加载
评论 #23265073 未加载
jeegsy大约 5 年前
As long as they follow the guidelines of the medical experts, everything should work out in the end. We are all in this together.
评论 #23264826 未加载
评论 #23264419 未加载
评论 #23264858 未加载