Depends on your own personal convictions. Once they have your data, they have it (unless laws come about forcing them to delete it, which is unlikely)<p>Personally I’m staunchly against it. Even Ring doorbell as well, they are rumored to begin using facial recognition and scan license plates. Too Orwellian for me.<p>My parents are surprisingly modern with technology, so they have Alexa in a few rooms, with most lights connected, and their garage.<p>Siri recently had a whistle blower contractor state they hear snippets of intimate conversations/sounds, with Siri not supposed to be activated.<p>These devices always have to listen, and for them to get better, the supervised learning must have a human say “yes/no” if the predicted output was correct for the input (in this case, activating on “Hey Siri”)<p>Some open source home automation systems are gaining traction, and once they’re a bit more mature, I’ll self host and begin my voice-assistance adoption. But until then, I’ll stick to the old ways :)<p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jul/26/apple-contractors-regularly-hear-confidential-details-on-siri-recordings" rel="nofollow">https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jul/26/apple-con...</a><p><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-whistleblower-siri-recordings-violating-fundamental-rights-2020-5" rel="nofollow">https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-whistleblower-siri-rec...</a><p><a href="https://theintercept.com/2019/11/26/amazon-ring-home-security-facial-recognition/" rel="nofollow">https://theintercept.com/2019/11/26/amazon-ring-home-securit...</a>