Facebook Employees Criticize Zuckerberg’s Inaction over Trump

Whenever I see articles like this, my BS radar detector goes off. These articles make it seem like huge numbers of employees are up in arms and ready to quit, but really it is almost always a loud vocal minority looking to impose their personal worldview on the company.<p>The only conditions under which a company should react to activist input is if they have done a company wide anonymous poll (and probably of their customer base as well). Otherwise, they will just hear from those who are committed to the cause (radicals&#x2F;zealots) or have psychological safety to voice their views. Given that big tech companies are mostly SF-based and secondarily Seattle-based, those internal cultures reflect only one perspective (the far-left progressive). Just remember, those far-left progressives make up just 8% of the population (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hiddentribes.us&#x2F;profiles" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hiddentribes.us&#x2F;profiles</a>). There are almost certainly moderate and conservative employees that back Zuckerberg&#x27;s position as well.

I’m going to be the guy in this thread who says that censorship is scary. Bots need to be stopped, and politically inflammatory fake news needs to be flagged and corrected... but we don’t get to say what we want unless people we hate&#x2F;fear also get to say what they want.

Zuckerberg knows he has a large conservative older user base. Losing them I bet is his concern

Zuckerberg isn&#x27;t insane. People in silicon valley sometime forget how much of a bubble they live in. Twitter just effectively started a full-scale war with the federal government.<p>Zuckerberg knows the blowback is coming. I can&#x27;t see how twitter doesn&#x27;t become a life long target of the Trump administration to make an example of. If Facebook doesn&#x27;t want to get caught in the splash zone they might want to back away from this one.

As they should. All it takes for evil is for good people to do nothing. FB and Twitter have been weaponized. This reduces the value of their platforms.<p>What do you do when a bully is the most powerful person in the world? Well you stand up to them as a community.<p>Take away his microphone.

At this point. If Trump can violet TOS and get away with it. Why can’t I or a bot. Side need to chosen and battle needs to be fought. It’s a lose lose for the likes of Twitter but at least Twitter is doing the right thing now.

I don&#x27;t even believe Trump was glorifying violence, but calling him out as if he did sure could rally the people who are actually starting the violence against innocent businesses and civilians. Too bad Twitter doesn&#x27;t have to govern themselves.<p>Trump&#x27;s tweet showed he was concerned, not glorifying. If he wanted to glorify it, he would probably say something more along the lines of &quot;Get in line or we will use our GREAT guns and military and open fire on you thugs.&quot; He also wouldn&#x27;t need riots as an excuse to tweet about such things.<p>Zuckerberg is supporting freedom of speech when his company didn&#x27;t have to choose to. He is correct that censoring only worsens the problem and it removes opportunities to improve the situation. If Trump were censored, people would not know him or what he is doing as well as they do now. Amidst all the risk to MZ&#x27;s company and the violence happening around us, his decision is highly courageous and respectable as he is serving the American people and their rights, even though he said himself that he doesn&#x27;t like what Trump said.

Is this news or opinion piece? Incendiary is clearly an opinion. &quot;(...)not to take action on incendiary comments posted to the social network by U.S. President Donald Trump.&quot;