TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Elon Musk calls for breakup of Amazon

64 点作者 noad将近 5 年前

9 条评论

enitihas将近 5 年前
In what sector is Amazon a monopoly. Retail? Walmart is much larger and Amazon&#x27;s share of the market is too small to be a monopoly. Ecommerce? Even in ecommerce, Amazon&#x27;s share is &lt;50%. Fun fact, Tesla has a 60% of electric car market in the US (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;electrek.co&#x2F;2020&#x2F;02&#x2F;04&#x2F;tesla-electric-car-sales-us-market-share&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;electrek.co&#x2F;2020&#x2F;02&#x2F;04&#x2F;tesla-electric-car-sales-us-m...</a>). Does that mean Tesla is a monopoly, and should be broken up?
评论 #23421625 未加载
评论 #23421524 未加载
评论 #23421570 未加载
评论 #23422115 未加载
sharkmerry将近 5 年前
Is amazon the only way to pubish an ebook?<p>Surely he could just post a PDF for paid download and have readers send the PDF to kindle if they really need to read it there.<p>Calling a book &quot;unreported truths...&quot; while things are rapidly changing is misleading at best
nix23将近 5 年前
Well he&#x27;s absolutely right, but in 20 years when SpaceX owns the only Mars-Colony&#x2F;City i vote also to breakup SpaceX
评论 #23422252 未加载
评论 #23420864 未加载
Spivak将近 5 年前
I don’t really know what anyone in this situation wanted to happen here? Amazon and Apple and Google have been trying to stem the tide of a massive wave of low-quality books and apps hitting their stores trying to make a quick buck off people’s ignorance and fear.<p>Refusing to publish content related to COVID because nobody has the time and resources to go through them all is the best you can do. If they just let people publish the story would be “Amazon doing nothing about COVID misinformation spreading through their store.”
评论 #23420737 未加载
mandeepj将近 5 年前
A couple of days ago he tweeted - &quot;off twitter for a while&quot;. I knew he&#x27;ll be back soon. So, there he is. His &quot;while&quot; is very short :-).<p>There&#x27;s a pattern here. He wants to be in the news actively. So, he picks up one thing or another. If you are not paying for marketing then you have to do it yourself.
m0zg将近 5 年前
He&#x27;s right though. As far as the first amendment goes, books are the most robust medium we have. You can go to Amazon right now and buy a copy of Mein Kampf, hardcover, paperback, or Kindle. Surely Berenson&#x27;s book is not worse than Mein Kampf?<p>Here&#x27;s a though experiment, reductio ad absurdum, if you will.<p>Say you like Bezos&#x27; politics and agree with the stuff he wants to censor. Say tomorrow Bezos is run over by a bus and, through a weirdest twist of fate in history (bear with me on this one) Richard Spencer takes his place, complete with his own, very different editorial preferences.<p>Would you still agree that Amazon, as a company, has an unimpeded right to censor speech then? And if not, you need to think very carefully why you&#x27;re _not_ against giving them this power now.
评论 #23421404 未加载
评论 #23421313 未加载
评论 #23421323 未加载
christefano将近 5 年前
CNBC article with more: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;06&#x2F;04&#x2F;elon-musk-calls-for-amazon-split-after-alex-berenson-claims-censorship.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;06&#x2F;04&#x2F;elon-musk-calls-for-amazon-s...</a>
kukx将近 5 年前
Elon is right it is insane. We do not want monopolies. And especially monopolies on information, books. I am not convinced that splitting a company by a government is the best solution, however in this case I do not see any other quick way to restore a balance, well maybe Amazon choosing to immediately stop its censorship policy.
8bithero将近 5 年前
It seems that Blue Origin must be making good progress.
评论 #23422262 未加载