TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Show HN: Water Cooler – Always-available chat for teams

57 点作者 rpg3将近 5 年前

15 条评论

rpg3将近 5 年前
Hi HN!<p>I&#x27;m Ricky, the founder of Water Cooler. I built Water Cooler to help bridge the gap between async written communication (Slack, email, etc) and live meetings.<p>As many companies suddenly shifted to remote work, I noticed a growing trend of leaving a Zoom meeting on in the background all day. In other cases, teams are scheduling constant back to back meetings. The reason for this is because teams suddenly needed to find a way to recreate the more informal, spontaneous conversation that you normally get from people being in the same physical location. The issue with this is they were using software designed for meetings to recreate something that happens almost exclusively outside of meetings.<p>The hope is that Water Cooler&#x27;s always available rooms will offer distributed teams a more natural way to communicate. And all are voice only by default, so there&#x27;s less of a draw to stare at our app all day (we want people to work, not stare at Water Cooler non-stop).<p>A bit about our security in light of everything happening with Zoom: All voice and video data is transmitted via WebRTC and is encrypted on the wire. We use Janus for our SFU (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;janus.conf.meetecho.com&#x2F;index.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;janus.conf.meetecho.com&#x2F;index.html</a>) which is open source and plan on enabling end to end encryption (for everyone, not just the paid users) later this year&#x2F;early next year via insertable streams. Obviously, we&#x27;ll be limited to offering this in our desktop app and newer versions of Chrome for the time being, but hopefully that won&#x27;t be the case for long.<p>We opened up Water Cooler to anyone without an invite two weeks ago and currently have about 35 teams using it. Would love to know what you guys think!
评论 #23435694 未加载
dpenguin将近 5 年前
First there were cubicles. Engineers could concentrate and get work done. They took a break by choice. The open office destroyed the productivity. One person speaks&#x2F;gets up&#x2F;chats with neighbor and everyone is distracted. You have to actively ignore your visual and aural inputs(maybe even smells). Remote work fixed it. You could now focus on your stuff and not worry about constant interrupts to your senses. Along comes water cooler to destroy that. You could say “don’t go the always on room if you don’t want to”. But the fact that it’s there, is distraction. “What is everyone talking about that I might be missing?”
评论 #23437304 未加载
silvi9将近 5 年前
Love the website, it looks absolutely fantastic. I thought it communicated the main points excellently, and I was glad to get to see some screenshots of the app in action too. I definitely want to sign up now. Always available rooms are a very cool idea, something a lot of teams will love! Congrats on launching!
评论 #23436087 未加载
purplezooey将近 5 年前
Now if only we could add the shitty office snacks and bitter as hell coffee, it would be just like normal
评论 #23436361 未加载
评论 #23436474 未加载
paxys将近 5 年前
Great idea! The design is a little too &quot;inspired&quot; by Slack though. I would strongly recommend adding at least basic video capability in the free version, since I don&#x27;t think most people (including me) are going to want to pay without even trying it out.
评论 #23436758 未加载
redasadki将近 5 年前
Sqwiggle is an ancestor to this started by Michael Gutman and Matt Boyd c.2012-2013. Some teams at IBM used it. But it freaked people out because it would auto-take a snapshot via your webcam to recreate presence. I thought it was great, but everyone else thought it was creepy. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20150316035657&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sqwiggle.com&#x2F;features&#x2F;real-presence" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20150316035657&#x2F;https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sqwig...</a>
评论 #23436820 未加载
programmarchy将近 5 年前
Looks great. On mobile now but will try it on desktop later. Is the pricing really sustainable though? Seems incredibly cheap for something that’ll be sucking up bandwidth and CPU for 8+ hrs&#x2F;day.
评论 #23436319 未加载
wilbo将近 5 年前
Great concept and looks like some great execution on designing for a professional environment.<p>What would you say are the advantages of Water Cooler over Discord?
评论 #23436797 未加载
outime将近 5 年前
My very first worry about these things is privacy. Surely work stuff shouldn&#x27;t be discussed in there but given that E2E isn&#x27;t mentioned what are the privacy guarantees compared to e.g. Zoom?<p>If no encryption is present then why wouldn&#x27;t I use Discord which also has features like screen sharing?<p>Congrats on launch!
评论 #23438838 未加载
quickthrower2将近 5 年前
I think ironically I’d be more shy to use this than a physical ping pong room. Not sure why though, but I think it’s the lack of a real life space and lack of an agenda combined. Maybe I’d get use to it.
评论 #23438845 未加载
alphagrep12345将近 5 年前
Looks great! If I&#x27;ve to incorporate this, would the workflow become Slack + Zoom + Water Cooler? Or would this replace any of Slack&#x2F;Zoom?
评论 #23436772 未加载
shyamady将近 5 年前
Interesting. The concept looks like Tandem. Also, I&#x27;m working on your app for the individual use cases. remotehour.com
评论 #23438933 未加载
sawyer29将近 5 年前
Looks cool! Congrats on the launch!
评论 #23444047 未加载
d0100将近 5 年前
We are currently using pragli which is free and does the job well enough
评论 #23438935 未加载
cvaidya1986将近 5 年前
Congrats on launch!
评论 #23436362 未加载