TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Richard Feynman: Magnets and Why Questions [video]

71 点作者 husein10大约 14 年前

8 条评论

bugsy大约 14 年前
I've seen this interview with Feynman before, it is very good. I've also seen the Insane Clown Posse video that mentions that they don't know how magnets work, and observed the backlash against them, that their video celebrates ignorance and so forth. My take is that those criticizing ICP are the ignorant anti-science ones.<p>I don't know how many physics or calculus classes ICP has taken, but let's assume the lyricist has a PhD in Physics. It's not an unreasonable assumption, to presume knowledge rather than ignorance.<p>I understand Maxwell's equations. I know what a dipole is and what flux is. Just this modest knowledge by itself is well beyond the educational attainment level of most ICP critics. This becomes rapidly clear when one attempts to discuss physics with them. That is not surprising, but it is surprising how many will criticize another for being ignorant when it is themselves who are ignorant. Maxwell's equations describe some relationships, but they do not tell us what magnetic fields really are. What is a magnetic field? No one really knows. We can describe with these equations what effects they produce and how magnetic and electric forces are interlinked. But what is really causing this stuff? What is it made of?<p>As Feynman says in the video, in iron you can line up the atoms so electrons spin in the same direction and thus so many induced small magnetic forces are aligned in one direction and thus amplified to the point they are noticeable, but what are these magnetic fields made of?<p>Nothing apparently, since they can propagate through a vacuum. But matter itself is made of bundles of these same e-m fields. In wave packets, they pretend to be something we like to call particles, which can travel through a vacuum as well but which don't really exist since they are made of waves which are nothing but vibrations. In the end there is nothing traveling through nothingness and all is nothing and no one knows anything. To those who understand physics, ICP comes across as pretty wise and observant. As Feynman says, "It is a very good question."
评论 #2344581 未加载
评论 #2345735 未加载
评论 #2344904 未加载
davej大约 14 年前
This is the mind of a brilliant educator at work. It would have been very easy for Feynman to give a scientifically literate answer but he realizes that there is no way to give an accessible explanation that doesn't fluff the details.<p>The following 'meta-answer' that Feynman provides is fascinating.
Cococabasa大约 14 年前
Seems like the answers to the question "Why?" are laid out like a fractal. It just keeps going...
hasenj大约 14 年前
While I agree with what he said, and find it fascinating, I can't help but feel that he still didn't answer the question.<p>"Why do magnets attract iron only" and "why can't objects intersect" are very interesting questions and I think about them sometimes. He kinda hinted that the explanation for both of them is related to the same basic principle, and that hint is very insightful to me, but I still wish that he went to a bit of depth and explained it a bit further.
jamiecobbett大约 14 年前
This video comes from a BBC series which can be watched here (from the UK at least): <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/feynman/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/archive/feynman/</a>
abhayv大约 14 年前
It is a beautiful answer by Feynman
hackermom大约 14 年前
An interesting insight not so much in the workings of magnetics, but more so in Feynman's labyrinthine mind. This video should be tagged "psychology" :)
rubashov大约 14 年前
I don't see why the initial rejection of the question was necessary, or that he really has a much a point to make about "why" being an invalid question. All he had to do was begin explaining magnetic forces and say that if you don't get it you need more background.
评论 #2344749 未加载