TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Chris Dixon discusses rising startup valuations & potential startup bubble

17 点作者 mviamari大约 14 年前

7 条评论

gte910h大约 14 年前
I don't see why everyone assumes a bubble.<p>I think it's just like real estate purchased for renting out: People know you can make money on it, people realize that, so invest in that knowing rental income can at least pay for the mortgage (in some markets). So all the low hanging fruit are gone as people are not afraid of investing in these companies. You have to go for less low hanging fruit and invest more to get your piece of the pie.<p>The idea of a valuation of a private company is possibly also the issue. Who says a company's public market cap (which is what valuation is supposedly mirroring) has anything to do with what a private company sold part of itself for.<p>I'd say in general, if X was the cost of 10% of a business, that's not saying you could actually buy it for 10X. You might actually have to pay 20X to buy the whole thing or perhaps only 5X.
评论 #2362138 未加载
mviamari大约 14 年前
I'm intrigued by the idea that you can have super high startup valuations and NOT have a startup bubble.
mcoliver大约 14 年前
Incredible discussion going on right now with huge players in the startup world. Kedrosky, Dolginow, Nivi, Hotchkiss, Dave Morin, etc... WOW
dlg大约 14 年前
The scenario they're talking about with the SEC regulating secondary markets is the most plausible theory of and unwing I've heard yet.
评论 #2361934 未加载
skotzko大约 14 年前
Epic convo with some major players. If you're in strtupland or a fan of it, you need to go listen in now.
scottieh大约 14 年前
Nice. So basically he's saying that it's too expensive for an investor as of late.
评论 #2361933 未加载
评论 #2362090 未加载
stevedc3大约 14 年前
Namesake is awesome - like the best of Twitter + Quora
评论 #2362186 未加载
评论 #2362139 未加载