TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Parallels Desktop for Mac Running on Mac with Apple Silicon

53 点作者 theBashShell将近 5 年前

14 条评论

johnklos将近 5 年前
Parallels really tries to constantly force people to upgrade every time there&#x27;s a new version.<p>They even pushed disfunction back to older versions - VMs which previously started unattended would be hung up with a &quot;sales&quot; window touting a new version, the VMs themselves wouldn&#x27;t start, and Parallels had no way to fix the &quot;issue&quot; aside from the same bullshit we&#x27;d expect from outsourced IT (&quot;Try uninstalling and reinstalling&quot;, et cetera).<p>Upgrades often required reactivating Windows VMs, which is a huge pain in the ass.<p>I wouldn&#x27;t trust Parallels with shit.
评论 #23624587 未加载
评论 #23624042 未加载
RodgerTheGreat将近 5 年前
Many years ago I purchased a retail copy of Parallels. Some time later, the product began displaying a splash screen on startup featuring ads for an upsell product. Ads in paid software is unacceptable; I immediately uninstalled Parallels and vowed to never give the creators money again.<p>This experience will always be the first thing that comes to mind when I hear the name &quot;Parallels&quot;.
评论 #23623502 未加载
zymhan将近 5 年前
The linked post says absolutely nothing of significance.
kccqzy将近 5 年前
What about VMware Fusion? I understand desktop virtualization isn&#x27;t how VMware makes money, but still VMware is the 800-pound gorilla in the virtualization space. I would be very surprised if Apple isn&#x27;t also working with VMware to bring their product to Apple Silicon.
评论 #23623507 未加载
评论 #23623481 未加载
thesquib将近 5 年前
Does anyone know why virtual machines running on macOS seem so much slower than the same virtual machines on the same hardware bit running Windows? This is what I have observed but I have not studied it in any depth. Maybe this change will improve things?
评论 #23623370 未加载
VWWHFSfQ将近 5 年前
Parallels is some of the worst software I&#x27;ve ever had to use.<p>If you need to run virtual machines on your Mac, then just use VirtualBox. Trying to run &quot;seamless&quot; windows apps on your Mac OS computer is a totally shit experience and nightmare.
whatever1将近 5 年前
Sorry for the uninitiated question, but is macOS on ARM only going to support virtualization of ARM OSes? Does that mean that we cannot get amd64 linux virtualization on macOS anymore?
评论 #23623503 未加载
guidedlight将近 5 年前
I believe the concern is around Windows x64 virtualization, not presumably Linux ARM virtualization.
评论 #23623261 未加载
评论 #23623161 未加载
Vomzor将近 5 年前
I hope Apple silicon will be fast enough to emulate x86-64 at decent speeds. Would be nice to be able to keep using 3DS Max on macOS.
评论 #23623513 未加载
sys_64738将近 5 年前
How useful is ARM Linux virtualisation nowadays? If you use Docker then are the ARM variations as mature as alpine based Dockers containers? Can you really deploy to x86 with just ARM Docker testing? If not then what utility do you gain here?
评论 #23623209 未加载
评论 #23623274 未加载
评论 #23623484 未加载
评论 #23623324 未加载
评论 #23624314 未加载
johnwheeler将近 5 年前
This is not a solution to getting Mac binaries compiled for intel to work with apple processors is it? Do the apple processors not have the same instruction set?
评论 #23623316 未加载
评论 #23623399 未加载
评论 #23623289 未加载
评论 #23623265 未加载
bfrog将近 5 年前
Why is it when parallels is brought up, its always &quot;award winning&quot; whats so award winning this point about virtual machine software.
justaguy88将近 5 年前
Will qemu support be available?
评论 #23623400 未加载
评论 #23623428 未加载
testfoobar将近 5 年前
&quot;Apple Silicon&quot; is an odd term. Given Apple&#x27;s brilliant global PR and marketing teams, I&#x27;m sure they had other candidates for branding their processor line in PR docs.<p>Is &quot;Apple Silicon&quot; really the best they could conjure. It is snobbish and vague. It evokes nothing about power, speed, performance or for that matter computation in general. It likely originated from the title of apple internal presentations over the years titled &quot;Transitioning x86 to Apple Silicon.&quot;<p>Who is the term &quot;Apple Silicon&quot; for? For buyers of ipads&#x2F;iphones. They don&#x27;t care at all. For buyers of MBA&#x2F;MBP&#x2F;iMac&#x2F;MacPro. Some will care.<p>A PR&#x2F;Marcom team got the latest presentation and was tasked with developing the external messaging. Instead of doing the challenging work of naming the Apple processor line, they just went with &quot;Apple Silicon&quot;.<p>What would Steve Jobs have done?<p>The term &quot;Apple Silicon&quot; appears 15 times on this page: &quot;Apple announces Mac transition to Apple silicon&quot; <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.apple.com&#x2F;newsroom&#x2F;2020&#x2F;06&#x2F;apple-announces-mac-transition-to-apple-silicon&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.apple.com&#x2F;newsroom&#x2F;2020&#x2F;06&#x2F;apple-announces-mac-t...</a>
评论 #23623566 未加载
评论 #23623811 未加载