TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Wildlife Services, a US agency planting 'cyanide bombs' to kill predators

180 点作者 rainhacker将近 5 年前

17 条评论

Exmoor将近 5 年前
A few years ago I read Coyote America, by Dan Flores. A large portion of this book is dedicated to Wildlife Services efforts to cull the Coyote. They've been fantastically unsuccessful in this effort, most likely due to behavioral quirk of the species. Coyotes can identify specific individuals by voice, and if one of those voices disappears from the nightly call it causes the females to enter estrus and breed. So if you kill a Coyote multiple more Coyotes literally spring up in their place.
评论 #23656543 未加载
评论 #23658344 未加载
评论 #23659134 未加载
hedora将近 5 年前
They shouldn’t be allowed to place them without notifying people beforehand, preferably by getting those people’s signatures.<p>According to the article, they’re nowhere near that level of notification. They certainly didn’t notify the local emergency response personnel, which is just negligent.<p>These things have the same failure mode as landmines: If forgotten, they might kill some random person years later, and at that point, locating and removing them costs orders of magnitude more than placing them.<p>At the very least, there needs to be a public map of where these things are, and an 5-10’ ring of signs at eye level around each one.<p>The tiny sign they place at ground level on top of the trap could easily be lost or overlooked, and it won’t inform people with pets to stay out of the area until it’s too late.
评论 #23657457 未加载
评论 #23658518 未加载
Icathian将近 5 年前
This article seems like a hell of a reach. I have a master&#x27;s in Fisheries Science that was funded in part by FWS, though I no longer work in that field, so I may not be entirely objective.<p>That said, the simple reality is that managing native species and how they interact with society has to be done. Whether it&#x27;s suburban coyotes killing off family pets (a big problem in my suburb at the moment) or rural clashes between ranchers and wolves, you cannot just let the situation unfurl without official intervention. Allowing civilians to handle it results in endangerment and extinction, and refusing to handle it results in ecological damage and risk to both people and livestock.<p>Now, if the only point is that better training and communication protocols for these Federal employees is in order, sure I buy that for basically every Federal department. Making out like FWS is some pet-assassinating Kremlin is pretty low-effort clickbait. The reason nobody&#x27;s heard of them is because nobody much cares about what does or doesn&#x27;t happen to coyotes and deer until it impacts them.
评论 #23652127 未加载
评论 #23653027 未加载
评论 #23653850 未加载
评论 #23653540 未加载
评论 #23655077 未加载
评论 #23655351 未加载
评论 #23652420 未加载
评论 #23652560 未加载
评论 #23653279 未加载
评论 #23657121 未加载
评论 #23651954 未加载
评论 #23654088 未加载
smcameron将近 5 年前
Here&#x27;s a description of the m44 device: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aphis.usda.gov&#x2F;publications&#x2F;wildlife_damage&#x2F;fs-m44-device.pdf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aphis.usda.gov&#x2F;publications&#x2F;wildlife_damage&#x2F;fs-m...</a>
评论 #23652339 未加载
cowboysauce将近 5 年前
I remember reading about these years ago and I&#x27;m surprised that they&#x27;re still in use. There&#x27;s definitely a need to control wildlife populations, but doing it with devices that are akin to cyanide landmines seems like a bad idea.<p>The people in the article were unaware that one of these devices was placed a few hundred feet from their property. The signage on these devices also seem to be very small. I&#x27;m wondering if medical services are given any training or a heads up when these devices are placed. Cyanide poisoning is not the most common thing and I&#x27;m wondering how quickly medical services would recognize it.<p>These devices also seem to contain a large amount of sodium cyanide (880 mg). This is definitely enough cyanide to kill a child and even some adults. Though it seems like the release mechanism would make it difficult for a person to actually ingest all of the cyanide.
Randor将近 5 年前
Wow,<p>This seems like a really bad idea. I would be furious if anyone put that thing 350ft from my house.
Phillips126将近 5 年前
Are these devices surrounded by warning signs to ward off individuals that may be getting too close? I&#x27;ve not heard of these devices before and as someone who lives on the edge of a large wooded area with young kids this alarms me. I&#x27;d presume they would at least nail some signs to nearby trees supporting bright colors to inform an uneducated passerby that danger lies ahead.<p>EDIT - After doing a bit more research on these mechanisms I feel a bit better knowing they are triggered by animals biting and pulling on the cloth portion to release the poison (I still don&#x27;t like these devices). I was concerned it was more proximity based. They do appear to be tagged with a bright colored warning label on the device itself.
cafard将近 5 年前
A relative used to work for them. It&#x27;s fair to say that the organization isn&#x27;t widely known, but you could say the same for the National Geodetic Survey.
评论 #23654145 未加载
评论 #23657018 未加载
Ericson2314将近 5 年前
The USDA is infamous for being especially cozy with the industry it&#x27;s supposed to look after. Department of the Interior should probably do anything to do with wildlife.
ryan_j_naughton将近 5 年前
&gt; &quot;The American Sheep Industry Association has called the M-44 a &#x27;critical tool&#x27; that has a &#x27;proven track record of protecting livestock and the environment&#x27;&quot;<p>I don&#x27;t see how a cyanide bomb intended to kill wild animals protects the environment. Those wolves are native species and part of the environment. Killing them is hurting the environment, definitionally. And given that these bombs don&#x27;t strategically kill invasive species and are just as if not more likely to kill native species, then I don&#x27;t see any reasonable claim that these are protecting the environment.<p>This is simply another case of regulatory capture where the government is helping the special interests that are farmers.
评论 #23660062 未加载
qppo将近 5 年前
I want to know what happened to the jackasses that thought it was a good idea to lay mines with poison gas on public lands
评论 #23654131 未加载
mattxxx将近 5 年前
Headline-crafting has gotten out of control; headlines like this really play off people&#x27;s anxiety&#x2F;insecurity, just to get a view.
评论 #23652995 未加载
评论 #23652237 未加载
aaron695将近 5 年前
&gt; The secretive government agency planting &#x27;cyanide bombs&#x27; across the US<p>There&#x27;s some sort of secret organisation putting arsenic packages around cities as well.<p>Might be attempts from the illuminati to kill off the homeless or your pet dogs or something, it&#x27;s hard to know.<p>Any old kid could pick one up and eat them, nothing is registered on any web sites of locations.
coolspot将近 5 年前
Previous discussions:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.algolia.com&#x2F;?q=cyanide" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;hn.algolia.com&#x2F;?q=cyanide</a>
vorpalhex将近 5 年前
Has the Guardian gotten worse or were they never that good to start with?<p>Wildlife services is hardly a secret branch, they are also the folks who airdrop rabies vaccine in remote areas. Yes they do take game from helicopter as part of their population management. Hogs in particular are frequently managed by helicopter since they like to hang out on private property.<p>The M44 device does have it&#x27;s issues but calling it a bomb is a gross misise of words - it&#x27;s a spring loaded aerosol. It&#x27;s typically used for pack management especially with hogs. Most of the concern with them is downstream of the food chain - a nontargeted animal eats a poisoned carcass, dies, and then something eats those remains.
评论 #23654422 未加载
评论 #23652053 未加载
bwb将近 5 年前
Scary!
catalogia将近 5 年前
I remember reading about this stuff years ago, it&#x27;s public knowledge. You could call this government agency obscure, but I wouldn&#x27;t say it&#x27;s secretive.
评论 #23654931 未加载