TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

To restore American leadership in semiconductor manufacturing

71 点作者 blopeur将近 5 年前

8 条评论

SkyMarshal将近 5 年前
American Institute of Physics Summary:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aip.org&#x2F;fyi&#x2F;federal-science-bill-tracker&#x2F;116th&#x2F;creating-helpful-incentives-produce-semiconductors-chips" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.aip.org&#x2F;fyi&#x2F;federal-science-bill-tracker&#x2F;116th&#x2F;c...</a><p>- Authorizes funding for semiconductor R&amp;D, including $3 billion for the National Science Foundation, $2 billion for the Department of Energy, and $2 billion for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s Electronics Resurgence Initiative<p>- Creates a multi-agency National Semiconductor Technology Center that would conduct research and prototyping of advanced semiconductors in partnership with the private sector, with a recommended budget of $3 billion over ten years<p>- Establishes an Advanced Packaging National Manufacturing Institute under the Department of Commerce with a recommended budget of $5 billion over five years and creates a semiconductor program at National Institute of Standards and Technology that would support a new Manufacturing USA institute<p>- Creates a $10 billion trust fund to match state and local incentives for investments in semiconductor manufacturing facilities<p>- Provides tax credits for qualified semiconductor equipment or manufacturing facility expenditures through 2027
评论 #23655322 未加载
yazaddaruvala将近 5 年前
It&#x27;ll be interesting to watch as congress balances vertical integration concerns with increased need for high-tech (like semiconductor) manufacturing.<p>Companies like AAPL and AMZN have shown multiple times, they are willing to invest past the barriers to entry to improve vertical integration, reduce their bottom line, but also give back some of those wins to their customers. Both of these companies are leaders in custom silicon, and it is only a matter of time before they prioritize the move into silicon fabrication as well.<p>Best case would be if, once mature, these companies would spin out subsidiaries which design generalized chips and fab chips for the entire industry. But if there is a push for regulation to have less vertical integration because of the enormous competitive advantages, its not clear where that line should be drawn for creating subsidiaries. It&#x27;ll be interesting to know if their decisions to invest into things like semiconductor manufacturing will be impacted by regulation and which is the less bad choice accounting for the economy and national defense.
rdlecler1将近 5 年前
We have intel and amd here already. It’s not clear that R&amp;D is the issue, it’s cost of manufacturing. This seems to be better solved with some kind of critical industry tax incentives.
评论 #23654834 未加载
phkahler将近 5 年前
Besides Intel (who doesnt need a subsidy IMHO) who even makes chips on advanced nodes in the US any more?
评论 #23654956 未加载
评论 #23654832 未加载
评论 #23654784 未加载
评论 #23654896 未加载
swiley将近 5 年前
Meh. This is treating a symptom. Semiconductor manufacturing moves very slowly and it just took it a while to live the US like everyone else did.
insaneisnotfree将近 5 年前
In my country this would never happen
groby_b将近 5 年前
Well, aren&#x27;t you glad we just made it untenable for a large number of experts on the subject to work here?
评论 #23655246 未加载
评论 #23654892 未加载
sand_castles将近 5 年前
When was the last time a political decree lead to change in who gets to be leader in what ?<p>The modern Chinese supply chain can only be replicated in few other places in the world.<p>I don&#x27;t see what the problem is to let China do what it does, and focus everybody else&#x27;s goal on other more important things - like reducing global C02 emissions.<p>You could generate millions of jobs just by doing that.
评论 #23654825 未加载
评论 #23654856 未加载
评论 #23654873 未加载
评论 #23654993 未加载
评论 #23654986 未加载