TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Facebook content policies tweaked over time to accommodate POTUS

108 点作者 thelock85将近 5 年前

9 条评论

0zymandias将近 5 年前
I am not a fan of Facebook and have deleted my account. But Zuck is right in trying to avoid policing political content. It just won’t work.<p>Twitter’s attempts, although idealistic, are a complete failure. Some tweets that are sanctioned are far less harmful than others that aren’t. Some tweets that are allowed are outright lies. Inserting Jack and his buddies as the arbiters of truth is not going to work. And frankly, I don’t want the Twitter exec team to tell me what I should believe or see.<p>I understand that there is more pressure on Zuck to follow. And he may very well have to bend to the outrage of people even though it makes no sense.
评论 #23673049 未加载
评论 #23673145 未加载
评论 #23672919 未加载
评论 #23673168 未加载
评论 #23673150 未加载
mxcrossb将近 5 年前
This is why I find all this talk about free speech completely disingenuous. From the start, these websites had rules to moderate content. They’ve just been afraid to enforce them against the president.
评论 #23673077 未加载
评论 #23674213 未加载
riffic将近 5 年前
Call your congress critters and ask them to look at drafting legislation requiring the Executive branch of government to self-host its own standards-compliant social media site, using government infrastructure.<p>We live in a day and age where ActivityPub exists and the White House could be running its own Mastodon server (well, I would not recommend that exactly, but it could be running something that speaks the same language).
评论 #23673081 未加载
评论 #23672967 未加载
评论 #23672987 未加载
评论 #23673217 未加载
justapassenger将近 5 年前
Free press is surprisingly supportive of an idea of a private corporations policing and setting standards of content and political discussions.<p>I hate how discussions look online about politics, but I worry that instead of pushing for accountability of public figures, through democratic tools and institutions, articles like that focus on trying to get a private police up and going.<p>Facebook, Twitter, Google, etc censoring more and more content from public figures won’t change the fact that USA have a racist president and that tons of people support him.<p>And while I think it’s a valid question how much of their racist and discriminatory content they should be allowed to say before they’re thrown out of office, it shouldn’t be decided by Silicon Valley.
评论 #23673401 未加载
评论 #23673204 未加载
noscrewstoyous将近 5 年前
love that everyone is expecting some sort of impartiality from advertising companies and data miners<p>policy isn’t the problem, it’s the platform itself
评论 #23672904 未加载
kyle_martin1将近 5 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;l7o4A16QCxE" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;l7o4A16QCxE</a>
NN88将近 5 年前
whats stopping a new titan website from ignoring this pressure?
sacks2k将近 5 年前
Why is it that I can have a group called &#x27;the only good cop is a dead cop&#x27; and this doesn&#x27;t violate any of Facebook&#x27;s terms? It&#x27;s clearly a hate group that is biased against an entire group of people. Aren&#x27;t we supposed to be against bias and bigotry? Or is it accepted because it&#x27;s a group that isn&#x27;t liked?<p>I also see death threats on Twitter all the time to: white people, republicans, white people, Jewish people, and police officers. These are allowed to persist to this day.<p>Ice cube, for instance, had a cartoon ripped straight out of anti-semitic propaganda from the Nazi era and it was taken down after many weeks because of a &#x27;copyright violation&#x27;.<p>Yet, if I even hint that I don&#x27;t agree with BLM or underage trans surgery, I will get booted off of Twitter for hate speech and if I&#x27;m not anonymous, mobs of people will attempt to get me fired from my job and kicked out of society.<p>The system does need to be changed.<p>We need to start with the uber-progressive tech companies that take it upon themselves to stifle the speech of people they deem unworthy.<p>Nobody should be able to have this much control over the population and it&#x27;s definitely going to start affecting our elections. It&#x27;s so much more powerful than the handful of fake Russian ads that were purchased in an attempt to sway voters (which wouldn&#x27;t have caused stadiums of people to come out to see Trump when he was running in 2016).<p>The reason we have Trump today is a direct result of this meddling. Trump and his team realized that all he needed to do was create the perfect sound byte and they would run with it and it would give him free advertising. He cast a net out and social networks and the media ran right into them every, single, time.<p>His team was also the most tech savvy. They used data mining companies to find out the best ways to get votes and played the social media game better than anyone.<p>Obama did almost the exact same thing in 2008. His team exploited a Facebook app that allowed them to get information on you and your friends when you installed it.<p>I still remember all of the tech magazines lauding his campaign as revolutionary, genius, and the the new way of political campaigns. It clearly violated Facebook&#x27;s TOS and user privacy. Yet, we saw no investigations.<p>It&#x27;s proof once again that it has more to do with politics than anything else. Progressive and liberal candidates and supporters of progressive and liberal causes can get away with murder.<p>I just wish we had true equality instead of special treatment for select groups of people.
评论 #23673912 未加载
评论 #23674422 未加载
flyinglizard将近 5 年前
POTUS is one side of it, and Facebook is a very big regulatory target if it decides to start a pissing contest with the elected US government; but apart of that, half of the voting Americans voted for POTUS and silencing their elected official is quite alienating too.
评论 #23673189 未加载