The courts question about the 7th amendment implications of the 2nd question is interesting. I guess they're basically asking, is the finding of fair use by the jury a finding of fact? If it is, the 7th amendment says that's not reviewable on appeal, only questions of law are. So in my extremely non-expert opinion, there 4 possible general outcomes (ignoring procedural outcomes where the court sends it back down for another go around):<p>* The APIs are not copyrightable<p>* They are but the jury found, as a fact that isn't reviewable, that Google's use is fair use<p>* They are, fair use is a matter of law, but the court agrees they're fair use<p>* They are, fair use is a matter of law, but the court disagrees that they are fair use<p>Anyone who's an actual lawyer, please feel free to jump in and correct me if I'm off base here.