TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Places for true un-politicized news about the US?

6 点作者 csneeky将近 5 年前
It's just that I rotate between all these organizations (e.g., reuters, cnn, foxnews, msnbc) and I legit don't know where to actually find unpartisan material anymore.

7 条评论

auganov将近 5 年前
Forget about nonpartisan. Everybody has a bias.<p>Most &quot;real&quot; news doesn&#x27;t happen everyday. If you follow it less often you&#x27;ll miss out on most fake stories and the ones that matter will still be around.<p>If you really want to follow the daily rumor mill you can try Twitter. Don&#x27;t follow too many people and you will develop a sense for who&#x27;s got good calls and who&#x27;s total noise. Also many people will actually link to authoritative evidence&#x2F;source, unlike most news websites that don&#x27;t want you to ever leave their domain.<p>Generally speaking for everything that news outlets cover Twitter should have better coverage as that&#x27;s where all the journalists hang out in the first place. For things that don&#x27;t get covered, don&#x27;t expect Twitter to do much better.
nabla9将近 5 年前
If you think Reuters is not unpartisan, your concept is flawed.<p>Most mainstream news about the US: Reuters, ABC News, USA Today, BBC, Wall Street Journal (News not Editorial),<p>You might also want to check sources like <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.allsides.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.allsides.com&#x2F;</a><p>You should also differentiate between news articles and opinion writing. Wapo and The Times write good analytical articles that are not biased.
评论 #23948804 未加载
082349872349872将近 5 年前
Read politicised news, and actively separate the facts reported from the editorial stance: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=23858477" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=23858477</a><p>&quot;If you agree with it, it&#x27;s truth. If you don&#x27;t agree, it&#x27;s propaganda. Pretend that it is all propaganda. See what happens on your analysis reports.&quot;
评论 #23949665 未加载
xvedejas将近 5 年前
AP and Reuters seem to be alright in my experience, as do some foreign sources (BBC). AllSides.com provides media bias ratings which pass my sanity filter, although I won&#x27;t claim to know how trustworthy a source they are.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.allsides.com&#x2F;media-bias&#x2F;media-bias-ratings" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.allsides.com&#x2F;media-bias&#x2F;media-bias-ratings</a>
评论 #23949168 未加载
评论 #23948762 未加载
评论 #23954128 未加载
keiferski将近 5 年前
As already mentioned, basically every news organization has its own bias.<p>However, I do recommend The Wall Street Journal. They have the biases you’d imagine, but I’ve found that they’re really only overt in the opinion pages. The regular reporting is fairly straightforward, unlike say, The New York Times, which manages to inject its bias into even the most mundane of topics.
surds将近 5 年前
Politico.com?<p>I am not American, but follow the politics. The content seems neutral to me but I haven’t really judged it seriously enough.
fulafel将近 5 年前
News covering current affairs is inherently political.