> Sure, other companies might have bigger brands and bigger sales budgets, but this is open-source.<p>No, it's not. They are delibetarely misusing a well-established term and they deserve to be called out for that. This is extremely antagonizing and it is impossible to take the rest of the project seriously when it is presented that way. The same thing happened when zoom said that their program did "end-to-end encryption", while it didn't; it was a great project, but tainted by a callous and misleading usage of terminology.