I work in the medical imaging space, specifically with implementing deep learning into clinical practice. I see a lot of people making a lot of fuss about what type of network or loss function to use. I would argue that this focus is misguided 90% of the time. Sure, maybe using a very specific network architecture and custom loss can edge you out by a 2-3% performance gain. But is that making or breaking the fundamental clinical application? I would argue that it usually is not. Instead, I've seen how much of the deep learning in medical imaging is driven by the quality and diversity of source data, which in the medical space can often be scarce for a number of reasons.<p>I'm reminded about this tweet, which emphasizes that
a lot of your performance is going to be down to how good your datasets are [0].<p>[0]. <a href="https://twitter.com/lishali88/status/994723759981453312" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/lishali88/status/994723759981453312</a>