TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Developer Defends His "Interesting" iPhone App UI

51 点作者 bdotdub将近 17 年前

9 条评论

sanj将近 17 年前
I feel for Steve Pratt. Full disclosure: I've met him, in passing, at various handheld events over the years, but he wouldn't know me from Adam.<p>What I've found, and what he's caught in, is that data-entry applications for very specific problems, tend to get ugly. And that's ok, because the users are very, very savvy. If you look at the software his company builds, you'll find that 90% of it is for savvy, specialized users.<p>I spent hours agonizing over how 'ugly' an early iteration of a handheld app was after the users came back and said to make certain buttons and text bigger. Multisize buttons!? Different font sizes on the screen!? Crazy! And BAD!<p>But Fitts Law says (paraphrased) that big buttons are easier to hit. So make that button that everyone needs to hit 20 times an hour BIG. Even if it is ugly.<p>Some text you want to be able to see from a device lying on your desk. Some you don't care about until you need to squint at it. So size it differently.<p>I've come to believe that's all good.<p>What isn't defensible is the parts of this app that are just plain sloppy. The size of buttons not being the same, but being off by a few pixels. Spacing being wonky. Fonts for the sake of fonts.
axod将近 17 年前
"Make something people want"<p>not<p>"Make something that looks nice"<p>Seems like he thought pretty carefuly about the use cases of customers, and tried to make things as simple as possible. Sometimes making things simple leads to a more cluttered UI I guess.<p>For something you use every day you don't really want more than a couple of screens. You want everything there... ready to be used.
评论 #240159 未加载
评论 #240156 未加载
henning将近 17 年前
Waiting for Godwin's law to take its inevitable course in this train wreck.<p>Flickr comments aren't much better than YouTube's for constructive criticism, it so happens - put up a classic, award-winning photo with your name attached to it and prosumer asswipes will tell you how the lighting and focus are all off.
bprater将近 17 年前
He handles it surprisingly well. A good lesson for all of us that have crap hurled our way.
评论 #240137 未加载
评论 #240152 未加载
hbien将近 17 年前
How would you handle all of these people cracking jokes about your app? There's some thoughtful criticism in there, but mostly it's just one "UI Expert" posting up a screenshot of the app for other people to make fun of it.
评论 #240200 未加载
评论 #240199 未加载
bootload将近 17 年前
<i>"... It does, however, have the advantage for iPhone owners that starting July 11, they'll be able to use it to record their deductible (or reimbursable) trip mileage. ..."</i><p>Go ugly, fast.<p>You might not win any design awards but you might be in business long enough to correct the problems. I'd seen this on flickr this week. Mac zealots tend to be a pretty mean bunch. Wonder how they go with this tone of criticism?
edw519将近 17 年前
In a debate, as soon as you offer your resume, you lose.
评论 #240236 未加载
sdurkin将近 17 年前
Don't whine, fix it.<p>By that I mean, propose specific suggestions for improvement. There's not a single constructive comment offered by the author.
nir将近 17 年前
Well done, Steve Pratt.<p>Sad to see the way the discussion around software is moving into Gawker-like territory of empty cynicism and juvenile cliques. It seems owning a Mac now qualifies a person as a UI expert and if you know what's a URL you're a certified geek.<p>Screw that. Software is not "art" in the pretentious-hipster version and not about cheap "opinions". It's about building stuff. Can we have Bubble 2.0 burst already, please?