TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

London traders hit $500M jackpot when oil went negative

185 点作者 Inconel将近 5 年前

15 条评论

zahma将近 5 年前
I'd greatly appreciate if any of you can explain how such a trade happened in layman's terms. Every time I try to look various vocab, I end up getting deeper into the glossary of hyperlinked words on investopedia and totally lose sight of the bigger picture.
评论 #24060116 未加载
评论 #24059134 未加载
评论 #24059605 未加载
anonu将近 5 年前
The crux of this trade was the TAS order type. It seems like these guys arbed the liquidity difference beyond their wildest dreams... But now they&#x27;re probably spooked about it because it sounds borderline manipulation.<p>Order types are constantly getting traders or exchanges in trouble. If you know about the less popular ones you always stand to beat out your competitors who dont. TAS reminds me of D-quotes on NYSE.
评论 #24056876 未加载
评论 #24057422 未加载
评论 #24057338 未加载
评论 #24058603 未加载
dmarlow将近 5 年前
I think most people saw the opportunity, but just didn&#x27;t know how to properly capitalize on it. At least that&#x27;s where I was. I wasn&#x27;t going to take delivery of any oil, that&#x27;s for sure. At least nothing that stood to make anything significant from. Then, there was also the whole contango thing too.
评论 #24058127 未加载
评论 #24057251 未加载
评论 #24056025 未加载
评论 #24057753 未加载
jb775将近 5 年前
&gt; There are also rules that forbid trading with the goal of deliberately affecting the settlement [price]<p>&gt; Vega’s jackpot involved about a dozen traders aggressively selling oil in unison before the May West Texas Intermediate contract settled at 2:30 p.m.<p>I think it&#x27;s safe to say the traders <i>deliberately</i> affected the settlement price. Granted they took on a lot of risk, it was still deliberate. Now the question is can that be proven, and was it deliberate enough?
评论 #24058875 未加载
bitxbit将近 5 年前
Interestingly enough crude options went zero bound for nearly half a day before market makers started to realize their quotes were off. One of the most thrilling experiences trading in a very long time.
kaycebasques将近 5 年前
There&#x27;s an episode of MacroVoices that was recorded in real-time as prices were going negative. You can hear the pain in Erik&#x27;s voice as he realizes how much profit he missed out on.
评论 #24056555 未加载
gigatexal将近 5 年前
Awesome now they can afford to pay London rents. :-D
评论 #24057005 未加载
neonate将近 5 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;2yDfi" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;archive.is&#x2F;2yDfi</a>
person_of_color将近 5 年前
Can someone ELI5 how energy trading works? I understand stocks, where you earn a portion of the company in return for dividends&#x2F;capital gains, and options, where you bet on the underlying movements on stocks. But how does this work?
评论 #24059189 未加载
pauljurczak将近 5 年前
Doing God&#x27;s work their every waking hour.
FabHK将近 5 年前
Matt Levine&#x27;s take (author of the Bloomberg column <i>Money Stuff):</i><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;opinion&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2020-08-04&#x2F;some-people-made-money-on-negative-oil-prices" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bloomberg.com&#x2F;opinion&#x2F;articles&#x2F;2020-08-04&#x2F;some-p...</a>
amelius将近 5 年前
What scares me is that someone with $100M would (with only a little imagination) have an incentive to buy a biological lab, start a pandemic and make $500M. But perhaps I watch too many movies ...
评论 #24059294 未加载
truckerbill将近 5 年前
No discussion here about the environment. This indirectly fuels demand.
评论 #24058389 未加载
tus88将近 5 年前
So which traders lost $500M?
评论 #24056520 未加载
Ecco将近 5 年前
I really wonder if those guys really created $500M worth of “value” for the rest of the world. Because if they didn’t, it means it’s theft...
评论 #24056356 未加载
评论 #24056265 未加载
评论 #24056482 未加载
评论 #24057823 未加载
评论 #24056233 未加载
评论 #24058116 未加载
评论 #24056251 未加载