TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

GPT-3 generated blog post reach #1 on Hacker News

173 点作者 hamsterbooster将近 5 年前

15 条评论

minimaxir将近 5 年前
HN submission from the blog post author, where the comments from dang reveal the author engaged in voting manipulation: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=24062702" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=24062702</a>
评论 #24165040 未加载
评论 #24164889 未加载
评论 #24165060 未加载
nabla9将近 5 年前
I think GPT-3 could be blessing for Reddit and HN type forums.<p>Add some GPT-3 content and links into the feed. Decrease the vote weight for users who upvote them and increase vote weight for those who downvote them.
评论 #24164716 未加载
评论 #24164858 未加载
评论 #24164978 未加载
评论 #24165745 未加载
评论 #24166783 未加载
评论 #24164712 未加载
评论 #24164688 未加载
dorkwood将近 5 年前
I remember skimming this article. My initial feeling was that it was written by someone who wasn&#x27;t a native English speaker. It seems like I&#x27;ll have to pay more close attention to that feeling in the future.
评论 #24164824 未加载
评论 #24164868 未加载
评论 #24164987 未加载
chmod775将近 5 年前
I have hopes this will actually <i>improve</i> the average quality of blog posts that get upvoted and shared on platforms.<p>Because people may realize that if their blog entry is going to be so bad it could be generated by GPT-3, they should probably be doing something else. And everyone else who is upvoting may just become a bit more aware what constitutes something of substance.<p>Things GPT-3 can&#x27;t do:<p><pre><code> - Research - Technical Documentation - Investigative Journalism - Write useful software </code></pre> GPT-3 may be able to fake the first three, but that would be glaringly obvious (because it&#x27;d be lying if it isn&#x27;t just copying and also each of those are generally more than just text content).
greenyoda将近 5 年前
The HN article that this is about: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=23893817" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=23893817</a><p>Congratulations to the authors of these comments, who correctly guessed that it was written by GPT-3:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=23894742" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=23894742</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=23894000" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=23894000</a>
评论 #24164624 未加载
评论 #24164957 未加载
评论 #24164661 未加载
评论 #24165042 未加载
umanwizard将近 5 年前
The article if written by a human was bad -- poorly argued and trite.<p>However, my mind is blown if it really was written by an AI. As bad as it might seem by human standards, it&#x27;s almost impossible for me to accept that this was created by an entity without consciousness or at least understanding.<p>Edit: it seems this might be a fraud; i.e., it indeed <i>was</i> produced by an entity with consciousness. I almost hope that’s true, as it’s much less unsettling.
评论 #24165085 未加载
runawaybottle将近 5 年前
Saw this coming a mile away.<p>A lot of articles that make it to the front page of HN are formulaic. We open ourselves up to this. Every blog post with shallow observations, every tutorial showcasing the first few pages of documentation, every biography on how to make money fast, every lucky shit that pontificates on how to manage teams and companies, every one selling an ebook, and everyone selling an ebook about selling an ebook after having sold 50 lifetime ebooks (topic being about success of course), and it was only a matter of time.<p>I count 3-4 posts about depression and existentialism per week on HN, and few ever reference the depth in which many great writers dig deep into the subject. Exercise more I guess.<p>Time to add ‘did a novice or a robot or a sociopathic narcissist write this?’ to our critical thinking toolbox.<p>Edit: I can’t tell if I fell for a gpt article about a gpt article, for what it’s worth. This is going to be a disaster when it hits the masses.
cellular将近 5 年前
I couldn&#x27;t read this article. I was convinced it was another AI generated text. I just scrolled to the bottom to see if I was right. Then didn&#x27;t read anyway because it could still probably be an ai.<p>You guys saw the last ai generated text about ai generated text-right?
camjohnson26将近 5 年前
Looks like he wrote the title by hand, how many upvoters read the actual article?
mellosouls将近 5 年前
More from the &quot;author&quot;.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;submitted?id=adolos" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;submitted?id=adolos</a>
评论 #24164731 未加载
bawolff将近 5 年前
Interesting. Has anyone done any analysis on what the tells are for GPT-3 written articles?<p>To me they feel like they&#x27;re slightly off grammatically. Not in an ESL way, but more like someone really anxious who wants to explain a conspiracy theory to you. However i can&#x27;t entirely put my finger on it. They do seem to overuse self-reflective statements (I think X) and transitionsal phrases. Maybe.
anigbrowl将近 5 年前
The best part is the very serious people shushing those who saw through the prank.
评论 #24164806 未加载
评论 #24164799 未加载
评论 #24164584 未加载
thrill将近 5 年前
“I think the value of online content is going to be reduced a lot.”<p>Or raised...
评论 #24164817 未加载
joshka将近 5 年前
Was this article written by GPT-3?<p>It&#x27;s so meta even this article ;)
评论 #24164747 未加载
guscost将近 5 年前
The first GPT-3 academic paper will be accepted before the end of the year.
评论 #24164905 未加载