TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

OCamlPro and the future of OCaml

49 点作者 budu大约 14 年前

4 条评论

noelwelsh大约 14 年前
A decade ago it looked like O'Caml was going to be the language that brought FP to the masses. It had good runtime performance, good tools, and a decent library. Then the development team basically did no work on the language for some eight or so years, and other languages, notably Scala, F#, and Haskell, have gained ground.<p>It is hard to cross from academia to commerce. The changes that were (and are) needed to O'Caml are not things that will result in publications, and thus don't fit the academic funding model. At the same time they are a precursor to attracting wider interest in the language. It seems that a benefactor like Jane Street is needed for this to occur. Certainly it seems that Jane Street is eager to spend money to fix this problem.<p>The story of O'Caml is a good reminder that in language adoption, as in business, execution, along with a bit of luck, what matters. The world is full of could-have-beens. And on that note, I've got code to write...
评论 #2419334 未加载
评论 #2421571 未加载
ajshankar大约 14 年前
The number one problem with commercial OCaml is the lack of comprehensive library support. Until that's addressed, it's not going to take off. Brilliant language, not very practical. F# is a step in the right direction here.
评论 #2418422 未加载
评论 #2418496 未加载
rsaarelm大约 14 年前
I wonder if there's any hope of ever getting type classes in OCaml. Then you'd be able to have stuff like a single "print" function you can give any type of value that can be turned into a string representation.
评论 #2418812 未加载
评论 #2419180 未加载
mobileman大约 14 年前
It would be interesting to know what they plan to do. It's easy to speculate l. It would be much more interesting to see ocaml on the jvm
评论 #2418504 未加载
评论 #2418472 未加载
评论 #2418412 未加载
评论 #2419031 未加载