TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Mystery of interstellar visitor 'Oumuamua gets trickier

227 点作者 Osiris30将近 5 年前

26 条评论

kentonv将近 5 年前
My pet theory (which is not intended to be taken too seriously) is that it is indeed a discarded light sail, and that light sail in particular was used to transport a Von Neumann probe which detached at some point after the object entered our solar system but before we first observed it. This detachment, in addition to leaving the sail tumbling, would have changed its trajectory, meaning our estimation of which direction the object originally came from is incorrect. In any case, the probe is now busy replicating, perhaps on the surface of Mercury. In a few years an army of robots will launch from there and invade the rest of the solar system!<p>Realistically, though, it&#x27;s too much of a coincidence that such a probe would first arrive so soon after we gained the ability to conceive of it.
评论 #24246555 未加载
评论 #24245152 未加载
评论 #24245234 未加载
评论 #24245582 未加载
评论 #24245929 未加载
评论 #24245910 未加载
评论 #24248462 未加载
评论 #24245592 未加载
评论 #24247383 未加载
评论 #24249796 未加载
评论 #24247991 未加载
评论 #24287150 未加载
评论 #24246853 未加载
评论 #24248954 未加载
评论 #24247996 未加载
评论 #24245702 未加载
评论 #24249451 未加载
sandworm101将近 5 年前
If we put half the energy we use up arguing about Oumuamua into detecting more interstellar objects we would have the data to end this debate.<p>I&#x27;m a fan of the pragmatic mathematical approach. This was the first thing detected. The chances that the first result is also any sort of outlier are very slim. Detect and track some more of these objects. I&#x27;d bet good money that Oumuamua&#x27;s motion is very explainable once we get some better data from other, similar, objects.
评论 #24244460 未加载
评论 #24244915 未加载
评论 #24249619 未加载
评论 #24244516 未加载
评论 #24245156 未加载
评论 #24245067 未加载
ekimekim将近 5 年前
&gt; Asked if there is a clear leading candidate explanation for &#x27;Oumuamua&#x27;s acceleration, Loeb referred Live Science to a not-yet-released book he authored called &quot;Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth,&quot; due for publication in January.<p>I don&#x27;t know enough about the science to have an informed opinion, but it seems to me that if the main skeptic is also selling a book based in their exciting alternate theory, that&#x27;s kinda a huge red flag.
评论 #24244899 未加载
评论 #24244913 未加载
henriquemaia将近 5 年前
I follow the <i>What da Math</i>[0] channel on YouTube to keep up with the latest news on cosmology. I highly recommend it. Very thorough and with daily updates.<p>[0] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtube.com&#x2F;user&#x2F;whatdamath" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtube.com&#x2F;user&#x2F;whatdamath</a>
sulam将近 5 年前
The subhead is &quot;Aliens? Or a chunk of solid hydrogen? Which idea makes less sense?&quot;<p>The better version would be: &quot;Journalism? Or Clickbait? Which idea makes less sense?&quot;<p>&quot;Scientific American&quot; indeed.
评论 #24247553 未加载
ekianjo将近 5 年前
&gt; Asked if there is a clear leading candidate explanation for &#x27;Oumuamua&#x27;s acceleration, Loeb referred Live Science to a not-yet-released book he authored called &quot;Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth,&quot; due for publication in January.<p>Oh this is an article without substance just to promote a book?
IAmGraydon将近 5 年前
Read the last sentence of the article. Bias warps perception. This shouldn&#x27;t even be posted here.
评论 #24245200 未加载
评论 #24246330 未加载
czzr将近 5 年前
Summary: hydrogen iceberg theory questioned as the expected lifespan of a hydrogen iceberg is likely too short, given the distance Oumuamua would have had to travel.
评论 #24244545 未加载
PopePompus将近 5 年前
Anytime you see an astronomy article in the popular press that sounds a bit flaky, you can bet Avi Loeb&#x27;s name will appear in it.
评论 #24249639 未加载
m3kw9将近 5 年前
We all need some more excitement in life, this unexpected piece of rock provides exactly that
elorant将近 5 年前
Previous discussion:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=24204323" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=24204323</a>
8bitsrule将近 5 年前
OK, suppose as proposed that the H2 in an object couldn&#x27;t survive the journey. What makes us certain that Oumu is interstellar? Haven&#x27;t seen that convincing argument (in human-readable form).<p>Voyagers I and II are leaving the solar system; they got the kinetic energy to do that. I&#x27;m not convinced that all plausible histories for that happening within the SS without human assistance have been explored. As for the makeup of the object ... that will remain hypothetical. Maybe if we&#x27;d seen it sooner ...
评论 #24248407 未加载
rbanffy将近 5 年前
Can&#x27;t we build a probe that can reach it? What&#x27;s the fastest we can launch a ton of equipment in Oumuamua&#x27;s direction?
评论 #24246067 未加载
评论 #24249651 未加载
_def将近 5 年前
I&#x27;m currently watching the Alien movies. Maybe it&#x27;s better that we are &quot;alone&quot; haha
评论 #24245415 未加载
bluedays将近 5 年前
This is pretty cool. I am constantly looking at current events and thinking to myself &quot;what if aliens were watching this?&quot;. I feel like it sorta puts things in perspective for me. Seeing that this might be a possibility is sorta thrilling.
评论 #24244812 未加载
评论 #24244363 未加载
评论 #24244345 未加载
kristianp将近 5 年前
Why does it have to be a hydrogen snowball? Because no tail was detected that would have indicated a dirty methane-etc snowball? What about an stony asteroid-like object?
评论 #24248017 未加载
lmilcin将近 5 年前
Well, if it was hydrogen iceberg it would not only accelerate when leaving Sol system, it would also <i>decelerate</i> when closing in.
评论 #24249947 未加载
lowdose将近 5 年前
To start playing aliens throw us a snowball. What would have happend when Oumuamua would hit our planet?
评论 #24244944 未加载
sidcool将近 5 年前
I have a strong belief that we will establish first contact by 2040.
评论 #24247705 未加载
dvh1990将近 5 年前
It could be a probe that scans solar systems. I like that idea.
mirekrusin将近 5 年前
Personally I find it suspicious for the first alien object detected to be of a shape of standard human poo.
ssrs将近 5 年前
2020. &#x27;nuff said.
jcims将近 5 年前
I feel we’ll be visiting it in a couple hundred years.
评论 #24245706 未加载
thesizeofa将近 5 年前
I suppose they need to drive traffic on “scientific”american by either flouting aliens, mysteries, or objects the size of several thousands football fields or washing machines.<p>There is nothing alien about this space object other than its geological origin.
person_of_color将近 5 年前
I don&#x27;t get it. Why don&#x27;t we image this thing directly?
评论 #24244714 未加载
评论 #24244670 未加载
评论 #24244648 未加载
ReptileMan将近 5 年前
And on far-off Earth, Dr. Carlisle Perera had as yet told no one how he had wakened from a restless sleep with the message from his subconscious still echoing in his brain: The Ramans do everything in threes.<p>We just have to hope there is at least one more