TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Why I'm Putting All My Savings into Bitcoin (2011)

37 点作者 baylearn将近 5 年前

9 条评论

ha4fsd3fas将近 5 年前
His arguments for investing in it in 2011 made sense but in 2020 they no longer do.<p>- Past performance has plateaued for years.<p>- Use cases are niche instead of regular transactions.<p>- Since the use cases are niche there is few uptake drivers.
评论 #24259925 未加载
评论 #24259924 未加载
评论 #24260119 未加载
评论 #24260036 未加载
oleganza将近 5 年前
Interestingly, past performance of the last 9 years did not change much in terms of perception:<p>1. People who believe that Bitcoin can eat the world, do not care when it goes up and down. Periodic rallies are unsurprising and upper limit is still to be reached (at very least, the entire mass of gold - about $8 trillion). It&#x27;s still early and cheap at current $200 bln capitalization.<p>2. People who do not buy the premise (&quot;displace fiat and physical moneys&quot;), or don&#x27;t think that Bitcoin is going to deliver (&quot;something better will come along&quot;), do not care about the price either - it&#x27;s just a giant bubble waiting to pop.<p>3. Plus a crowd of short-term speculators who are no different than Forex people, just with higher volatility at hand.
评论 #24260075 未加载
HermanMartinus将近 5 年前
If bitcoin were as useful as pundits suggested, we&#x27;d be using it by now. 12 years is a long time to validate an idea. The mobile phone was adopted by pretty much the entire world in under 7 years.
评论 #24260206 未加载
评论 #24259814 未加载
评论 #24259911 未加载
评论 #24260167 未加载
评论 #24259798 未加载
评论 #24259845 未加载
9nGQluzmnq3M将近 5 年前
He bought in at $3, and as of 2017 he had a 1000x return on his investment. Today that would be circa 3000x.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;falkvinge.net&#x2F;2017&#x2F;06&#x2F;11&#x2F;right-money-bitcoin-hits-3000-1000x-entry-point-six-years-ago&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;falkvinge.net&#x2F;2017&#x2F;06&#x2F;11&#x2F;right-money-bitcoin-hits-30...</a><p>Interestingly, he was very wrong about the 2nd reason to buy BTC (it hasn&#x27;t exactly replaced the existing financial system), but the other two -- past performance and &quot;civil liberties&quot; (for drugs, ransomware etc) were close enough.
评论 #24260079 未加载
评论 #24259872 未加载
评论 #24259769 未加载
framecowbird将近 5 年前
&gt; Use case: the key advantage for bitcoin is that it does away with all bureaucracy, all transaction fees, and perhaps foremost, all transaction delays and gatekeepers in the financial system.<p>Can anybody comment on the state of this today, right now?<p>Personally it seems like bitcoin would involve _more_ bureaucracy and delays for me than using the regular banking system. However I&#x27;m sure I&#x27;m not representative.<p>Are there other situations where bitcoin does, <i>right now</i>, reduce bureaucratic overhead?
评论 #24259810 未加载
评论 #24260041 未加载
评论 #24260055 未加载
评论 #24260316 未加载
评论 #24275866 未加载
simiones将近 5 年前
It&#x27;s not clear why the article is claiming that there are no transaction fees in Bitcoin, my understanding was that high transaction fees was one of the main reason that Steam, for example, dropped Bitcoin support (I think it was something to the tune of several dollars per transaction, targeting for the transaction to be finalized in &lt;30 minutes?).
评论 #24260173 未加载
评论 #24260208 未加载
评论 #24262913 未加载
siddMahen将近 5 年前
Bitcoin is by no means “an undetectable and untrackable financial system”.
评论 #24259806 未加载
callamdelaney将近 5 年前
The question is - did he keep it in bitcoin or not?
评论 #24259878 未加载
评论 #24259906 未加载
notacoward将近 5 年前
I guess diversification is for losers, then?<p><i>Even if</i> Bitcoin were the best investment out there, putting all of one&#x27;s savings into one asset is gambling. If one has financial responsibility to&#x2F;for others (e.g. dependents or clients) it&#x27;s malfeasance. Even the people with the very best ability to predict the future hedge those bets.