TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

AWS Controllers for Kubernetes

111 点作者 yonasb超过 4 年前

10 条评论

sytse超过 4 年前
Kelsey Hightower had a good take in <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;kelseyhightower&#x2F;status&#x2F;1296311951530704896" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;kelseyhightower&#x2F;status&#x2F;12963119515307048...</a> &quot;AWS Controllers for Kubernetes is pretty dope. You can leverage Kubernetes to manage AWS resources such as API gateways and S3 buckets. Think Terraform but backed by Kubernetes style APIs and &quot;realtime&quot; control loops.&quot;<p>An in the thread he mentions Crossplane as the cross-cloud way to do this <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;kelseyhightower&#x2F;status&#x2F;1296321377134231552" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;kelseyhightower&#x2F;status&#x2F;12963213771342315...</a>
评论 #24273760 未加载
评论 #24276101 未加载
评论 #24273843 未加载
mfer超过 4 年前
One consequence is the accidental deletion of AWS things...<p>If a CRD is deleted the CRs described it are also deleted. So, deleting a CRD (even accidentally) could end up deleting resources in AWS (e.g., backups). So, be careful.<p>Some things being managed by Kubernetes would be really cool. Other things being managed by k8s could break things if something goes wrong. I would plan accordingly.
评论 #24274086 未加载
评论 #24274586 未加载
评论 #24274029 未加载
评论 #24275454 未加载
评论 #24274054 未加载
compsciphd超过 4 年前
I started building something along this line a few years ago. the ability to control AWS VM and treat them as pods (i.e. can backend a service, access other services) to have a hybrid (VM &#x2F; Container) infrastucture that is all managed in the kubernetes way. Future work would have been to try and manage other resources similarly.<p>Sadly startup interest changed and then went under (but the freedom I was given to explore there was the best experience I have ever had)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;apporbit&#x2F;infranetes" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;apporbit&#x2F;infranetes</a>
buzer超过 4 年前
Some prior discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=24219448" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=24219448</a>
just-juan-post超过 4 年前
You can create a S3 bucket but you can&#x27;t set permissions on it.<p>Pass, I&#x27;ll check back in a year.
cagenut超过 4 年前
On the one hand this could be such a cool and powerful concept.<p>On the other hand my brain segfaults on the recursive loop of how the layer-inversion gets modeled as IaC with a CI&#x2F;CD pipeline. I guess if you were very strict about having your provider-infra layer (cloudformation&#x2F;terraform) do only the bare minimum to get your kube environment up, and then within that kube environment you used something like ACK to provision any cloud-provider resources that your kube-managed apps&#x2F;pipelines needed.<p>Yet another case where I&#x27;m like &quot;I don&#x27;t know if kube should be the answer to everything, but I sure as shit won&#x27;t miss &lt;x&gt;&quot;.
评论 #24273798 未加载
HereBeBeasties超过 4 年前
See also KubeForm - <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;kubeform.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;kubeform.com&#x2F;</a> which will do a lot of this already, via Terraform.
nikolay超过 4 年前
I Terraform Kubernetes Operator sounds like a better idea.
MuffinFlavored超过 4 年前
How is this different than Terraform?
评论 #24278139 未加载
brian_herman__超过 4 年前
This reminds me of this classic comic. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.catmuseumsf.org&#x2F;images&#x2F;print&#x2F;comix&#x2F;bill.jpg" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.catmuseumsf.org&#x2F;images&#x2F;print&#x2F;comix&#x2F;bill.jpg</a>
评论 #24277843 未加载
评论 #24276208 未加载