TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Nano-diamond self-charging batteries could disrupt energy as we know it

38 点作者 yurisagalov超过 4 年前

10 条评论

leplen超过 4 年前
This is silly. It's not going to disrupt Li-ion. Power outputs are way too low. C14 has a half life of 5700 years. This isn't going to output Li-ion levels of power/weight for 5 millennia. It looks like it might give you microwatts/gram, but this is much closer to existing nuclear tech like RTGs or beta voltaics than it is to Li-ion batteries.
评论 #24279637 未加载
评论 #24279535 未加载
评论 #24279265 未加载
allears超过 4 年前
Lotsa claims, artist's rendition of possible product. Wake me up when it's on Amazon.
bXVsbGVy超过 4 年前
&gt; NDB says [the batteries] will be cost-competitive with, and sometimes significantly less expensive than – current lithium batteries. That equation is helped along by the fact that some of the suppliers of the original nuclear waste will pay NDB to take it off their hands.<p>How much C-14 is produce annually?
bXVsbGVy超过 4 年前
Unexpectedly, snopes [1] has a good overview of the technology until 2017.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.snopes.com&#x2F;fact-check&#x2F;radioactive-diamond-batteries-real-thing&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.snopes.com&#x2F;fact-check&#x2F;radioactive-diamond-batter...</a>
评论 #24279794 未加载
Normille超过 4 年前
I&#x27;m not knowledgeable enough to comment on the validity of these claims but my gut feeling is along the lines of <i>&quot;If it sounds too good to be true...&quot;</i><p>Also, the description of the technology sounds so simple that I find it difficult to believe no-one&#x27;s thought of it before <i>ergo</i> there must be a catch.<p>It would be great if this was for real though. The possibilities of such such a thing are almost unimaginable.
deepnotderp超过 4 年前
So is this basically a charge based version of a RTG (hence the diamond semiconductor)?<p>Edit: apparently these devices are called betavoltaics
评论 #24278360 未加载
robomartin超过 4 年前
I know this isn&#x27;t necessarily a logic-based conclusion...<p>My first thought was &quot;Chief Medical Officer? Huh? No. Thanks. I smell bs.&quot;
vardump超过 4 年前
Like many of the comments in the article said, I don&#x27;t think this would be safe. Diamonds can be shattered and they do burn.
评论 #24278382 未加载
_benj超过 4 年前
In spite of all the grandiose claims, if their claims are even half of what they say, it would be pretty impressive!
megameter超过 4 年前
I&#x27;d love to believe it. It sounds plausible. I&#x27;d have to see a lot more to invest in it.