TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

I was excited for Neuralink, then I watched the demo

40 点作者 two_almonds超过 4 年前

17 条评论

ansible超过 4 年前
The demo was impressive. Did the author not see the part where they were predicting the body position of the walking pig?<p>I don&#x27;t see how that is going to be done with stick on sensors.<p>And yes, some implantable BCI devices have better capability. The point is to make this as cheap as possible... so that it doesn&#x27;t require a brain surgeon to install. Because brain surgeons are expensive.
评论 #24341709 未加载
评论 #24340383 未加载
vansul超过 4 年前
To me (neuro undergrad, comp sci masters), the demo seemed underwhelming but encouraging. As far as I can tell the tech was not doing anything particularly novel and the &#x27;fitbit in your skull&#x27; analogy was personally uninspiring. [edit: the volume of reads &#x2F;form factor is a step forward]<p>That said, the demo was mostly for attracting talent - lots of money and a great team will likely get them somewhere. In terms of their long term goals I expect the area that will give them the most trouble is reading&#x2F;writing interesting stuff on the cortex. Neural coding is really hard and poorly understood.
评论 #24340640 未加载
评论 #24340636 未加载
SiempreViernes超过 4 年前
Prof Andrew Jackson, Professor of Neural Interfaces, Newcastle University, said:<p>&gt; “Neuralink are progressing through the steps that have been taken with previous neural interface technology. They have moved from rodents to a large mammal (pigs), and are apparently seeking FDA approval for a human trial. I had some sympathy with Elon, having also had experience of animal experiments that don’t work perfectly the day we have visitors in the room! But proving the safety of new biomedical implants in animals is always a vital step towards a clinical trial.<p>&gt; “I don’t think there was anything revolutionary in the presentation, but they are working through the engineering challenges of placing multiple electrodes into the brain. In terms of their technology, 1024 channels is not that impressive these days, but the electronics to relay them wirelessly is state-of-the-art, and the robotic implantation is nice.<p>&gt; “But the biggest challenge is what you do with all this brain data. The demonstrations were actually quite underwhelming in this regard, and didn’t show anything that hasn’t been done before (e.g. decoding limb position during walking). There is a big difference between recording brain cells and ‘reading thoughts’, especially when it comes to higher-level cognitive functions that we don’t understand as well. The idea of ‘writing to the brain’ is even more questionable – there are fundamental limitations to targeting specific networks of neurons in a meaningful way using electrical stimulation.<p>&gt; “So in summary I would say this is solid engineering but mediocre neuroscience. Finally, I think it is unfortunate that they are presenting their work in this way, rather than publishing peer-reviewed papers that would allow their claims to be scrutinised, but I guess this is something that we will have to get used to as neural interfaces move from the academic to the commercial sector.”<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sciencemediacentre.org&#x2F;expert-reaction-to-elon-musks-neuralink-demonstration-involving-pigs&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.sciencemediacentre.org&#x2F;expert-reaction-to-elon-m...</a>
评论 #24351042 未加载
moontear超过 4 年前
I am not an expert, but what I thought was remarkable is the 12000 channels Musk talked about. New cochlear implants have 120 channels - one channel is one neuron (AFAIK) - more neurons is better results.<p>I would love some expert take on this, but my first reaction was „12000 sounds like a lot - they all work? That’s cool“.<p>Also check out this wait but why article which I think explains the resolution pretty well: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;waitbutwhy.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;04&#x2F;neuralink.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;waitbutwhy.com&#x2F;2017&#x2F;04&#x2F;neuralink.html</a>
评论 #24340449 未加载
评论 #24341003 未加载
评论 #24340920 未加载
评论 #24340358 未加载
two_almonds超过 4 年前
They stated explicitly that this was a recruitment event, so personally I feel like some of the hype can be forgiven.<p>The tone of this article is negative and I instinctively want to defend Neuralink because I hope that we can eventually achieve all of those sci-fi ambitions. But I think that&#x27;s the wrong approach, and possibly insulting to researchers who have been working on these problems for decades only to be overshadowed by what I have to admit was not the most impressive demo.<p>However, this event does attract attention, so what I&#x27;m really hoping for is an influx of long-read articles and in-depth analyses coming from experts in the various fields surrounding Neuralink&#x27;s aims as a result of the hightened interest in the topic.
miked85超过 4 年前
The &quot;tech demo&quot; was less than impressive. 3 pigs all acting normal, one (supposedly) had the implant and then had it removed, one (supposedly) had the implant and made a lot of beeping sounds, and one was, well, just a normal pig.
评论 #24340278 未加载
swiley超过 4 年前
If they handle the software for this in any way like the Tesla I wouldn’t want it near my head.
评论 #24340448 未加载
waihtis超过 4 年前
These various networked computer components being attached to our bodies make me very nervous. See: hackers control pacemaker shock cycles with malware. [1]<p>Software will always be vulnerable and it’s just a matter of time until someone gets eliminated by this vector - or worse, think about a wormable exploit aimed at mass adopted Neuralinks to mass fry people..<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;story&#x2F;pacemaker-hack-malware-black-hat&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.wired.com&#x2F;story&#x2F;pacemaker-hack-malware-black-hat...</a>
评论 #24340363 未加载
yholio超过 4 年前
Neuralink is not a startup, it is a research lab dabbling in a very speculative area. Something might come out of it in the very long run, or it might not. The demo showed essentially a tool they are using in this research, a miniaturized brain implant which is technologically superior to what competing researchers are using. They showed an application of that research tool, a recorded session (not included in the actual demo, probably hard to reproduce) where they claim to have &quot;predicted&quot; the movements of a pig. &quot;Predicted&quot; is probably a strong word since the brain controls motor functions.<p>So they showed progress and proved they are actually a lab and actually perform research. That being said, there was absolutely nothing in the demo remotely related to a &quot;brain-computer&quot; interface, nor are they likely to get there for many, many years. That&#x27;s the speed when doing hard science, and pumping more money only has a marginal efect.
refresher超过 4 年前
&gt;But that didn’t stop me from getting hyped up to the point of forgetting that Musk is a con-artist at worst and just some dude with a bunch of money and charisma at best.<p>Seems a bit harsh.
djohnston超过 4 年前
one feature i dont understand about neuralink is the promised transmission of thoughts.<p>lets say i have a device that can encode activity of every neuron in my brain simultaneously. i think some variation of the thought &quot;elephant,&quot; and the neuralink creates some digital representation of these signals.<p>then i send that digital encoding to your brain&#x27;s neuralink.<p>how on earth are you going to think of ANY elephant, let alone my elephant? the structural nature of our brains is certainly different, the network of activated neurons aren&#x27;t isomorphic, certainly not identical, right?<p>i am by no means an expert, but i dont see how you can ever take a digital signal and turn it into a conscious meat thought.<p>motor signals seem somewhat more tractable
评论 #24340386 未加载
评论 #24340511 未加载
评论 #24344868 未加载
评论 #24340564 未加载
peteretep超过 4 年前
&gt; Elon Musk preys on the hopeful and optimistic<p>Yes but he also launches rockets into fucking space; that is to say, he may be selling snake oil, but he’s also selling legitimate magic beans.
评论 #24340401 未加载
评论 #24340423 未加载
评论 #24340416 未加载
评论 #24340455 未加载
评论 #24340405 未加载
arijun超过 4 年前
I think the author calling Musk a conman is too strong a reaction to what goes on. I think Musk has a tendency to oversell already great technology with science fiction. Teslas are amazing cars but full self driving has been 6 months away for years now.<p>Like the author, I would also be upset if I believed Musks promises of a brain-computer interface, only to see them dashed. But Neuralink is already an amazing improvement, and I am still excited to see what will come of it.
评论 #24340507 未加载
评论 #24340487 未加载
nihil75超过 4 年前
This article is completely wrong and celebrates ignorance.
评论 #24340549 未加载
ashildr超过 4 年前
&gt; Elon Musk preys on the hopeful and optimistic.<p>Drama queen.
ykevinator超过 4 年前
This reads like a teenage girl rolling her eyes wrote it.
dayaz36超过 4 年前
Why is this article even being shared on HN let alone end up on the front page within minutes of posting? Anyone with the slightest understanding of this topic can poke holes in every single sentence in this ridiculously uninformed article. I stopped reading half way as it was making me dumber. HN can be so demoralizing sometimes. You&#x27;d think this would be the last place to find innovators being smeared but here we are...