TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Fusion is not 20 years in the future.It’s 50 years in the past–and we missed it

20 点作者 zero_kool超过 4 年前

3 条评论

ALittleLight超过 4 年前
&quot;The deuterium in a single cubic meter of seawater contains the as much energy as nearly 1,400 barrels of crude oil - enough to supply the civilizaton&#x27;s energy needs for hundreds of millions of years - until long after the Sun itself has flamed out.&quot;<p>What does that sentence mean? It seems like a claim that the energy of 1,400 barrels of crude oil is enough to sustain civilization for a long time, but that seems implausible to me. Also, off by an order of magnitude on the timeline for the sun burning out.<p>Whenever I read stuff like this now I start to get paranoid that this is written by GPT-3.
评论 #24372408 未加载
评论 #24372475 未加载
评论 #24372457 未加载
评论 #24373502 未加载
评论 #24372417 未加载
评论 #24372433 未加载
joeberon超过 4 年前
I can’t possibly believe that this would not already have been pounced on by both scientists and major governments if it were as promising as made out here, sorry.
评论 #24372442 未加载
vbezhenar超过 4 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Fusor" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Fusor</a> : Fusors are not considered a viable concept for large-scale energy production by scientists.
评论 #24372423 未加载