TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Nikola: How to Parlay an Ocean of Lies into a Partnership with GM

477 点作者 aripickar超过 4 年前

50 条评论

eigenvalue超过 4 年前
It does sound pretty bad, doesn't it? The guy certainly seems to have a problem with telling the truth. I think it's crazy to compare him to Musk, since Musk is actually extremely smart and knowledgeable about multiple areas of engineering. This other guy is just parotting the same lines, like "we are an advanced energy company that just happens to sell cars!". It's like the cargo-cult version of Tesla without any interesting technology or innovation. All that being said, I hope the author of this write-up has a good lawyer!
评论 #24437040 未加载
评论 #24437153 未加载
评论 #24437957 未加载
评论 #24437286 未加载
评论 #24438179 未加载
评论 #24437218 未加载
paulpan超过 4 年前
Anyone else getting Theranos vibes? As others have stated here, Hindenburgresearch is a known short-seller and so has an self interest to drive down the stock price of Nikola.<p>Also it was only yesterday that GM announced taking an 11% in the company for $2B. Surely GM has done their due diligence before throwing a couple of billions in? <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnn.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;09&#x2F;08&#x2F;business&#x2F;nikola-gm-badger-electric-vehicles&#x2F;index.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnn.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;09&#x2F;08&#x2F;business&#x2F;nikola-gm-badger-ele...</a><p>That all said, everyone also thought Theranos was legitimate until they were exposed to be not.
评论 #24437357 未加载
评论 #24437738 未加载
评论 #24437489 未加载
评论 #24437288 未加载
评论 #24443819 未加载
评论 #24437962 未加载
评论 #24437657 未加载
clomond超过 4 年前
And the thread of the sweater gets pulled...<p>While not shocking given the previous track record of Trevor&#x27;s previous enterprises - the most likely outcome here is that it will get very, very ugly. He also already &#x27;cashed out&#x27; millions of dollars to buy a 32.5 million dollar ranch - one of the largest residential properties in Utah&#x27;s history. [1]<p>Tesla&#x27;s run up and general optimism around EVs seems to have triggered a gold rush of sorts, effecting other EV pureplays&#x27; stock prices (ex. NIO) regardless of progress and actual state of the technology.<p>While in theory I am in strong support of new financing models to bring new technologies to market(ex. these Special Purpose Acquisition Companies - SPACs) I am very concerned that if even a portion of the alleged is true, this could poison this financing route for legitimate businesses and the sector overall. A camp in the investment industry even think Tesla is a fraud, and this would only harm the narrative and long term mission of Tesla.<p>It would have been great if they actually took the money, utilized it with a plan and executed on the plan to help with electrification - the premise for which I think many retail investors have become involved.<p>Even if there was no fraud, I was always skeptical of their plan (smelled like vaporware to me) and their adamance about hydrogen as an energy storage medium without sufficient discussion on electrolyzer technology or how those unit economics work always struck me as big red flags. Seems like Nikola&#x27;s plan was to combine a bunch of off the shelf parts existing from other sources into a product, in that case - where is the technology? So much of it with just the bit of digging and what I hear about it has made me skeptical.<p>Probably best to stay as far away as possible and see where the chips fall. I do wish them the best though, assuming there was no fraud.<p>[1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.latimes.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;real-estate&#x2F;story&#x2F;2019-11-14&#x2F;nikola-motor-head-trevor-milton-2000-acre-utah-ranch" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.latimes.com&#x2F;business&#x2F;real-estate&#x2F;story&#x2F;2019-11-1...</a>
评论 #24437245 未加载
评论 #24438289 未加载
评论 #24437267 未加载
tempsy超过 4 年前
This interview from April 2019 was the thing that convinced me he was a fraud. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.truckinginfo.com&#x2F;330475&#x2F;whats-behind-the-grille-of-the-new-nikola-hydrogen-electric-truck" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.truckinginfo.com&#x2F;330475&#x2F;whats-behind-the-grille-...</a><p>This gem right here:<p>&gt; &quot;The entire infotainment system is a HTML 5 super computer,&quot; Milton said. &quot;That&#x27;s the standard language for computer programmers around the world, so using it let&#x27;s us build our own chips. And HTML 5 is very secure. Every component is linked on the data network, all speaking the same language. It&#x27;s not a bunch of separate systems that somehow still manage to communicate.&quot;<p>This guy does not know what HTML is. What he has described is not what HTML would be used for.<p>And I&#x27;m supposed to believe he&#x27;s some sort of mastermind behind some new age hydrogen&#x2F;electric truck?
评论 #24437509 未加载
评论 #24438040 未加载
评论 #24437348 未加载
评论 #24437690 未加载
评论 #24437490 未加载
评论 #24437603 未加载
评论 #24437601 未加载
评论 #24437719 未加载
评论 #24437908 未加载
评论 #24437565 未加载
评论 #24437580 未加载
评论 #24439605 未加载
评论 #24437363 未加载
评论 #24437350 未加载
ctvo超过 4 年前
I find the audacity of the fraud hilarious.<p>They pulled a truck up a hill and let it roll down unpowered, using it in a video demonstrating their new EV technology when nothing worked. Who does that.
评论 #24437149 未加载
评论 #24437099 未加载
评论 #24437137 未加载
评论 #24445912 未加载
评论 #24437162 未加载
评论 #24437131 未加载
评论 #24437096 未加载
patentatt超过 4 年前
Am I the only one who reads these stories of high level fraud (this one and Theranos) and think: “why not me?” I’d like to say I have higher ethical standards, but these conmen have cashed out a loooot of money doing this, and I think my ethics would also get flexible as dollar amounts get into the 8 or 9-figures. But then I realize, this type of a person has been doing this their whole life. This guy bilked his partner out of $50k in selling a $300k business. I just wouldn’t think it’s worth the hassle to lie through my teeth to everyone around me for $50k. That’s the difference between us and them, I guess, it’s the small-time fraud you have to slog through to make it to the big-leagues of scams.
评论 #24437987 未加载
评论 #24442524 未加载
评论 #24438254 未加载
评论 #24438749 未加载
评论 #24460112 未加载
avolcano超过 4 年前
&quot;Hindenburg Research&quot; is already an excellent name for a short seller, but in this case, they are short selling a company creating cars powered by <i>hydrogen fuel cells</i>. 2020 continues to be an incredibly on-the-nose year.
ahupp超过 4 年前
&gt; Initial Disclosure: After extensive research, we have taken a short position in shares of Nikola Corp.<p>This is a great example of why shorts are socially valuable. Without that incentive who would go to the trouble of doing all this research to uncover (possible) fraud? This topic that comes up a lot on Money Stuff, where its easier for private companies to hide misbehavior because you can only short the public ones.
评论 #24439905 未加载
SigmundA超过 4 年前
I have been watching Nikola for years wondering why anyone believes its BS, I didn&#x27;t realize the deception was this blatant and deep, I guess like many I didn&#x27;t do real due diligence, but I didn&#x27;t invest millions in the company either.<p>Very sad and disheartening to see it continue and get further investment, just make me think that telling the truth does&#x27;t pay, selling lies does, fake it till you make it taken to the extreme, similar to Tharanos.<p>The over promise under deliver approach Musk uses annoy&#x27;s me but there is something real there, real results, Nikloa is literally riding on a play of a name of another company. At least Musk recognizes the issues with Hydrogen and he obviously has a grasp of the technical issues:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=yFPnT-DCBVs" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=yFPnT-DCBVs</a>
评论 #24438078 未加载
axiom92超过 4 年前
From the link:<p><i>Nikola’s Director of Hydrogen Production&#x2F;Infrastructure Is Trevor Milton’s Little Brother, Who Worked Paving Driveways in Hawaii Prior To Joining at Nikola</i><p><i>Nikola’s Chief Engineer: A Background Largely in Software Development and Pinball Machine Repair</i>
评论 #24438710 未加载
评论 #24437521 未加载
syspec超过 4 年前
I was wondering, how on earth this company even came to be listed on NASDAQ, since they have no products and no revenue.<p>So I looked it up and basically it looks like they acquired a company which was ALREADY listed on NASDAQ then renamed it.<p>&gt; In March 2020, Nikola announced its plans to merge with VectoIQ[10] Acquisition Corporation[11] (ticker VTIQ), a publicly traded special purpose acquisition company run by former General Motors Co. executive Steve Girsky. This resulted in the combined company being listed on the NASDAQ exchange with the NKLA ticker symbol.[12] Nikola’s stock began trading on June 4, 2020, a day after the merger was completed<p>- <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Nikola_Corporation" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Nikola_Corporation</a>
评论 #24437480 未加载
评论 #24437398 未加载
foolfoolz超过 4 年前
this is interesting. i worked for someone like this who was CEO of a YC backed startup. everything was “in progress” but really hadn’t started. the stuff that was “finished” was ongoing or never happened. it got to the point where every line in a meeting about plans i had to question to find the real story. you can get very far bullshitting your way
zaroth超过 4 年前
I think it’s a bit funny how some discussion in this thread has veered into denigrating Musk — who is at times one of the ten richest people in the entire world, and who ships products that millions of people have bought or aspire to purchasing, and who is predominately responsible for ushering in this entire era of the electronic car.<p>Don’t forget that “Hindenburg Research” (seriously?!) stands to make many tens or hundreds of millions of dollars based on whether they can convince a significant number of shareholders that what they are claiming is true. And also that if they are successful in doing so that it also becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.<p>I have no reason to believe or disbelieve any claims being made in TFA, so the only thing I can say for sure is that that this “report” is in no way altruistic.<p>One of the very precarious notions around short selling is the financial incentive it provides to ruinously slander a company, and the very meager legal protections a company has against defamatory claims that short sellers make — in the name of “analysis” — against a company that they stand to make a fortune from if it fails.<p>Without knowing anything one way or another about Nikola, the only thing I can say for certain is that if Nikola misstates a material fact to investors they can go to jail, whereas if “Hindenburg” gets their facts entirely wrong they face no repercussions. They have no duty to the shareholders of Nikola stock, and the legal peril of being even willfully wrong in their analysis is minuscule compared to what Nikola officers could face from the SEC.<p>That’s just the grain of salt I would carefully consider before reading anything that Hindenburg puts out.
评论 #24439401 未加载
评论 #24440071 未加载
jariel超过 4 年前
The fraud is not interesting.<p>The fact that big companies and Big CEO&#x27;s are stupid and incompetent is the interesting thing.<p>Everyone who worked on this deal at GM should be fired along with the CEO.<p>I once worked at a &#x27;Big Company&#x27; that thought about buying n Mp3 player. Everyone loved their CEO, their pitch, the box, product looked slick.<p>We were going to buy it. I took it home and tried it and it was garbage.<p>Literally our M&amp;A team, execs, due diligence and <i>nobody bothered to f</i><i></i>ing try the dam product* and use a little bit of common sense to ascertain whether it was &#x27;quality&#x27; or not.<p>This was not fraud, and of a much smaller scale, but it&#x27;s just incredible how big the &#x27;blind spot&#x27; so many executives have.<p>Edit: I said executives were &#x27;stupid&#x27; they generally are not. They just have gaping holes in their abilities, that enough ego doesn&#x27;t allow them to even see themselves. It&#x27;s understandable they don&#x27;t want to look weak, but insane that they don&#x27;t do background&#x2F;deep checks.<p>If I were a CEO I would include &#x27;product &amp; IP validation&#x27; right up front as part of due diligence - not just by &#x27;accredited people&#x27; (because you can&#x27;t get a &#x27;CA&#x27; in tech) but by people you trust.<p>Edit 2:<p>&quot;Trevor has appointed his brother, Travis, as “Director of Hydrogen Production&#x2F;Infrastructure” to oversee this critical part of the business. Travis’s prior experience looks to have largely consisted of pouring concrete driveways and doing subcontractor work on home renovations in Hawaii.&quot;<p>Oh please make this into a Tiger King Netflix special ...
评论 #24437627 未加载
hn_throwaway_99超过 4 年前
Totally reminds me of Theranos. &quot;Charismatic&quot; (I put that in quotes because they&#x27;re only charismatic to a certain group of people, I think the more &quot;mechanical&quot; thinkers like myself view them about as charismatic as a used-car salesman) founder who the industry touts as &quot;the next Jobs&#x2F;Musk&quot; excels at sounding like a ton of bullshit but is able to convince well-heeled investors to pony up a lot of money due to FOMO.
评论 #24438755 未加载
dzdt超过 4 年前
Does anyone have a contrary spurce of positive evidence that Nikola honestly does have valuable working technology? I have not made any effort to dig, but what little I had seen of Nikola so far seemed more hype than substance so the accusations here seem pretty believable.
评论 #24438184 未加载
shajznnckfke超过 4 年前
I’m not big on trading individual stocks, but I own a bunch of long puts on Nikola. I don’t know any other company that seems as likely to go to zero (other than companies like Hertz, where everyone knows so the options are priced appropriately).
评论 #24437063 未加载
评论 #24437097 未加载
ChuckMcM超过 4 年前
The sad part for me is that this reads like a profile of a &quot;successful, new age, startup entrepreneur&quot; relying on the &#x27;fake it till you make it&#x27; mantra betting other people&#x27;s money on the outside chance they can figure out how to do what they claim they already do before everyone else catches on.<p>I would have expected that GM&#x27;s due diligence team would uncover this sort of stuff prior to taking an 11% position in the company.<p>Which proves to me, once again, that the way to get rich is to defraud people with a lot of money, and not a lot of insight.
评论 #24437688 未加载
评论 #24437976 未加载
评论 #24437721 未加载
thrill超过 4 年前
Hindenburg Research is a well known short seller.
评论 #24437031 未加载
评论 #24437015 未加载
评论 #24437057 未加载
评论 #24437148 未加载
baltimore超过 4 年前
Why do I cringe when I see &quot;at a high rate of speed&quot; where &quot;at high speed&quot; should be?
评论 #24437027 未加载
评论 #24437050 未加载
评论 #24437983 未加载
evo_9超过 4 年前
Reminds me of Magic Leap but even their bullshit wasn’t this thick. At least they shipped something I guess.
dugditches超过 4 年前
&gt;On the morning of September 8, 2020, Nikola announced a strategic manufacturing partnership with General Motors, sending shares of both companies sharply higher.<p>Interesting that GM seems to be making a lot of moves at once.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;09&#x2F;03&#x2F;gm-and-honda-to-estabish-strategic-alliance-in-north-america.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnbc.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;09&#x2F;03&#x2F;gm-and-honda-to-estabish-str...</a>
dba7dba超过 4 年前
I know Hyundai Motor started shipping production model of fuel-cell truck in July 2020. They are planning to ship 1,600 hydrogen-powered Xcient trucks to customers by 2025.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.autoblog.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;07&#x2F;08&#x2F;hyundai-xcient-fuel-cell-semi-truck-hydrogen-electric-europe&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.autoblog.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;07&#x2F;08&#x2F;hyundai-xcient-fuel-cell...</a><p>And then I ran into this article. <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.autoblog.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;08&#x2F;13&#x2F;nikola-hyundai-hydrogen-partnership&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.autoblog.com&#x2F;2020&#x2F;08&#x2F;13&#x2F;nikola-hyundai-hydrogen-...</a><p>Trevor Milton, founder of Nikola Corp, said he would like to cooperate with Hyundai. He said he had twice made proposals to Hyundai that were rejected.
wyxuan超过 4 年前
They said that they would release a report on a well known company but this is a little disappointing. I think everyone knew that Nikola was pretty shady to begin with. After all, it’s not everyday when the company sells merch that revolves around their trading symbol
vsskanth超过 4 年前
So it seems GM didn&#x27;t really give any money to Nikola ? The article mentions they get 2 billion equivalent in stocks for non-cash contributions and 700 million in reimbursements from Nikola.
评论 #24437499 未加载
WheelsAtLarge超过 4 年前
Nikola seems to be little more than an idea but this report won&#x27;t sink their ship. The reality is that the world is looking for the replacement for our carbon based energy system. Even if he just comes close to making a dent he and the people around him will be well rewarded. Everything starts with a dream, he seems to be a bit farther along than that. I won&#x27;t invest but the car companies should at least help him make his dream come true. It will benefit all of us.
hinkley超过 4 年前
I searched my heart for sympathy, and all I found was this bucket of crocodile tears.<p>Someone sold GM on a fraudulent electric vehicle future? Let&#x27;s ask some former EV1 owners how that feels.
throwawaysea超过 4 年前
For those who have read “Bad Blood”, which details the fraud and unethical practices behind Theranos, this deeply comprehensive account of Nikola feels like deja Vu. I wonder if the same power dynamics are in play here as well, making the truth hard to recover from those close to it while an incompetent news industry continues primarily writing positive headlines that enable the fraud.
m3kw9超过 4 年前
Check this one: “ elaborate ruse—Nikola had the truck towed to the top of a hill on a remote stretch of road and simply filmed it rolling down the hill.”
swyx超过 4 年前
nikola stock only down 11% today, market cap 14bn. is this report credible at all? why is the market not taking this more seriously?
评论 #24437789 未加载
评论 #24437262 未加载
评论 #24437283 未加载
simonebrunozzi超过 4 年前
&gt; Trevor has appointed his brother, Travis, as “Director of Hydrogen Production&#x2F;Infrastructure” to oversee this critical part of the business. Travis’s prior experience looks to have largely consisted of pouring concrete driveways and doing subcontractor work on home renovations in Hawaii.<p>This might be one of the best parts.
solarengineer超过 4 年前
What of this article at cnet, where they show a working truck used by Budweiser in 2019?<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnet.com&#x2F;roadshow&#x2F;news&#x2F;budweiser-beer-nikola-hydrogen-electric-semi-truck&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.cnet.com&#x2F;roadshow&#x2F;news&#x2F;budweiser-beer-nikola-hyd...</a>
nickik超过 4 年前
I totally agree here. Following this space for a long time, Nikola has always been by far the shadiest of all these companies.<p>They were one of the very few companies that claimed revolutionary battery technology. This is an instant red flag and a huge one. New revolutionary batteries don&#x27;t just just happen.<p>Sila Nanotechnology, is only replacing anode materials, and they have been at it since 2012 and don&#x27;t expect to be in cars until 2025. Quantum Scape, who want to make Solid State Li Anode batteries is not gone be in cars until 2025.<p>There were a number of other companies who also did this &#x27;we have revolutionary batteries&#x27;. Some actually believed they did. Dyson is a good example, they wanted to create a car, and to achieve their targets, they invested lots of money including in batteries. However since they are a honest company they eventually admired that they couldn&#x27;t hit their engineering targets and abandoned the project.<p>A Nikola competitor in the arena of bullshit spinning is Henry Fisker. His first company made lots of nonsense claims, including about batteries, but unlike Nikola they actually went threw the trouble and made some investment in future battery tech, just not credibly commercial ones. They went bankrupt. His new company is right back to the old bullshit spinning way but they have lower their ambitions and just open say they want to buy the VM MEB platform, now they are gone be the most &#x27;sustainable&#x27; among other claims.<p>As a comparison, Tesla &#x27;revolutionary&#x27; technology at battery day will likely not be a silicon anode or a lithium anode, those are simply not ready for commercial use. Revolutionary battery technology would be 10-20% energy density improvment and 30-50% longer lifetime maybe 2x faster production speed, and Tesla has been working on this for 5-10 years and have spent many 100s of millions acquiring a set of companies and having research agreement with multiple universities that all work in collaboration. In total I would guess to really bring a new cell to market at scale, you are talking 5-15 years and 5 billion $, and that is still with basically conventional cell chemistry.<p>Much of the same can be said about Fuel Cells. Toyota, Honda and also the Koreans have been banging their head against the fuel cell wall for 30 years, with heaps of government money to back them up. They know they can&#x27;t make it work, even with their massive resources. In personal vehicles they are not competitive against EVs in the slights (while also not being an improvement in CO2 compared to Gas) while in trucks they are not competitive with Disel or Natural Gas, and soon electric trucks are gone take the majority of routes over as nobody can compete with their price on these short and mid distant routes.<p>But Nikola are gone make it, and not for a geographically small place like Japan, but for the gigantic US without much government support either.<p>Another topic is that of product announcements. If you follow Nikola for many years, or you go back to 2016 and look at their announcements there is a funny effect that happens. People can say about Elon Time what they like, but mostly the products actually do come out and often are improved over the original announcement in a number of ways. Nikola shows the exact opposite pattern. It goes something like this, announce revolutionary new product but its 3-5 years out. Then progressively lower the specs over time, while pushing the time to market out further.<p>The hype for anything EV related has been insane. Quantum Scape is a fine company for example, but they have valuation that is insane for a company that is not gone make real money for many years and not gone make profits for many more after that. They essentially have a technology that requires a totally new manufacturing system, while competitors like Sila can put their materials in existing facilities claim the same level of improvements. I wouldn&#x27;t expose myself to a unique technology with so much competition<p>There are tons of EV startups and they differ widely from Lucid, Rivian being serious companies step by step putting in place a solid car company. Dynamic companies like NIO coming out of China. And there are the bottom feeders like Nikola, Fisker and others that surf on the hype.<p>This is gone be a massive market shakeout with Tesla being the leader hunted by everybody. Slow moving giants like VW, Toyota and so on finally realizing whats happening and taking methodical step after step. And a massive wave of startups from around the world, especially China trying to be next next big thing. Its gone be interesting to say the least.
jdhn超过 4 年前
It&#x27;s my opinion that GM felt forced to enter into this partnership with Nikola because Ford was able to get into bed with Rivian when GM pulled out of that deal. For GM&#x27;s sake, I hope that these guys are completely wrong.
评论 #24437681 未加载
leesec超过 4 年前
Bigger shocker here. I hope Rivian doesn&#x27;t follow the same path, but I can&#x27;t seem to find any real videos of their truck doing what they&#x27;ve been saying it&#x27;s capable of either.
评论 #24444924 未加载
aurizon超过 4 年前
Now GM has the unenviable task of picking up this turd by the clean end.....
评论 #24437693 未加载
codeisawesome超过 4 年前
How do we tell that this research has &#x27;teeth&#x27;? Sounds super juicy if true! Would there be a &#x27;ticket number&#x27; of some kind for an SEC complaint that Hindenburg filed?
m1117超过 4 年前
This thread went to the second page of hacker news in 4 hours, while the amount of upvotes beats anything on the front page. Looks like throttling.
galkk超过 4 年前
Holy shit. I&#x27;d be staging my fake death already.
yaacovtp超过 4 年前
Why were tweets deleted all the way back to June?
Animats超过 4 年前
Now we understand how GM paid a billion dollars for Cruise when all they had was a road-follower, something GM already had.
yalogin超过 4 年前
One look at their site tells you it’s a fraud. They have nothing. Simply riding on the current fad.
Whut超过 4 年前
I really look forward to reading the book about the inevitable meltdown.
new_realist超过 4 年前
Tesla is 17 years old; Nikola is far less advanced.<p>Elon Musk fanboys are jealous that Trevor Milton is doing it better, faster.
m1117超过 4 年前
So theranos!
dzonga超过 4 年前
would a black dude been able to pull of a straight eye | face fraud like this ?
评论 #24439796 未加载
extremeMath超过 4 年前
Worse GM may be a zombie company.<p>Your taxes will always be supporting their business.
mberning超过 4 年前
Reminds me of the GE hit piece appearing on gefraud.com that tanked the stock and is now nowhere to be seen. Nor is the guy that authored it. I’m sure they made out like a bandit on their options.
Ecstatify超过 4 年前
There seems to be such negativity surrounding electric vehicles in the media. I wonder if there’s a vested interest deliberately trying to create this narrative. Electric vehicles are definitely the future.
评论 #24437146 未加载
评论 #24437750 未加载
thedudeabides5超过 4 年前
Well this is a first, top of HN with no comments.<p>I&#x27;ll say it, I have no idea of validity of any of these statements, need to go read. But do remember getting weird stock pump and dump emails about this company a long time ago and it always put a bad taste in my mouth.