TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Amazon staffers took bribes, manipulated marketplace, leaked search algorithms

141 点作者 Saad_M超过 4 年前

14 条评论

dlgeek超过 4 年前
Previous Discussion: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=24520462" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=24520462</a>
评论 #24544949 未加载
dalbasal超过 4 年前
Note the scale here:<p>Conspirators paid $100k in bribes. <i>&quot;Products and merchants earned in excess of $100 million in sales revenue.&quot;</i><p>I haven&#x27;t heard the job titles of the amazon employees yet, but presumably these are not very senior people. In terms of corruption dynamics, Amazon is now like a planning authority where a friendly official can rubber stamp a large fortune into a real estate developer&#x27;s pocket.<p>Also note that, like with government corruption a lot of corruption stays just to the left of criminal red lines. Many former employees of large marketplaces (amazon, FB ads, adwords) move into the more lucrative seller side, either as employees or consultants. They are expected to bring inside knowledge and contacts to the table.<p>There have already been serious antitrust cases (eg the EU adwords case) concerning these marketplaces. More are coming. Meaningful fines or enforcement is yet to be seen.<p>Now, $100m corruption incidents.<p>I&#x27;m putting my money on the table now. Tech monopolies are <i>the</i> major political-economic issue of the 2020s.
评论 #24543872 未加载
评论 #24543601 未加载
评论 #24543696 未加载
评论 #24543833 未加载
评论 #24544073 未加载
评论 #24543618 未加载
wegs超过 4 年前
I think one of the problems Amazon suffers -- and this is not a condemnation of the company as a whole -- is that it treats employees like garbage and runs a sweatshop. There is zero loyalty among Amazon employees I know. Some are very highly-compensated sweatshop workers, but sweatshop workers nonetheless (a lot of fintech and quant work the same way, and even more extreme -- you get a lot of money, but you have no work&#x2F;life balance, are on call 24&#x2F;7, and if your performance slips for a moment, even due to a family emergency, and you get the pink slip).<p>That sets a strong environment for corruption.<p>Why is this not a condemnation of Amazon? Turns out each corporate structure has problems. You pull on one lever, and you get a dozen unwanted consequences. But it&#x27;s important to recognize the faults of such structures.
评论 #24544258 未加载
评论 #24544379 未加载
评论 #24544351 未加载
one2know超过 4 年前
Management is very corrupt at Amazon. Lets just say the teams tasked with catching theft are strongly pointed to the lowest level employees like dock workers, pickers, and stowers. Lets also just say the managers are the ones shoving product over the fence.
tolbish超过 4 年前
&quot;Your Honor, I was taking bribes merely out of customer obsession!&quot;
mikece超过 4 年前
Good to see that something is being done but when there&#x27;s money to be made and humans are in the decision loop there&#x27;s going to be an opportunity for social engineering and corruption. Amazon is the biggest target but I suspect this is going on anywhere else there&#x27;s a large enough cohort of shoppers (eBay?).
swalsh超过 4 年前
I&#x27;m generally against the 20th century solution of breaking companies up when it comes to tech companies... but Amazon&#x27;s problems are not Facebooks or Google&#x27;s. It&#x27;s way simpler, and it fits the mold perfectly. First of all, Amazon should absolutely not be allowed to operate both a retailer and a marketplace. Second of all, this marketplace is way too large. It is clearly not in the consumers favor for such a large marketplace to exist.<p>Fortunately Amazons service oriented architecture should make this break up a breeze.
Waterluvian超过 4 年前
Do large companies basically create an “eggs all in one basket” risk?<p>If the market supplied by Amazon was instead supplied by 10 smaller companies, the attack surface would be higher but the impact would be lower, right?<p>Feels like large corporations could be seen as a national security risk (and not just “guns and ammo” security but “economic stability” security)
评论 #24544098 未加载
评论 #24543878 未加载
Saad_M超过 4 年前
I guess this effects all companies that run a platform whether it be social or market based. The question is what can a company do prevent bad internal actors without put their employees under draconian rules?
ctdeneen超过 4 年前
Maybe any major change to a system, for example turning on an seller&#x27;s account that was banned, should require a small explanation that is reviewed by additional employees.<p>For example 1,user x disables account, fraudulent health products<p>2,user y enables account, ????<p>Seems like many major changes almost never require a user to justify them with a written explanation.
ilaksh超过 4 年前
I&#x27;m sure it&#x27;s just a few rogue staffers rather than being a structural issue.<p>Because of course it&#x27;s not problem for the company that owns and controls the marketplace to compete with most of the products in it. It&#x27;s only a few bad apples.<p>That was sarcasm by the way.<p>There is a sane alternative and it&#x27;s called distributed protocols.
StreamBright超过 4 年前
I think Jeff has become inactive of managing Amazon&#x27;s online retail business unit and stopped caring few years ago. The results:<p>- fake products<p>- fake reviews<p>- ad based search<p>- massive scale bribery scheme
ilamont超过 4 年前
I reported a violation of Amazon&#x27;s community guidelines and Seller TOS for a popular electronics product I purchased earlier this month (details: <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;leanmedia.org&#x2F;amazon-is-broken&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;leanmedia.org&#x2F;amazon-is-broken&#x2F;</a>). Here&#x27;s the thread with support:<p><i>Me: Hi. The box for this product contained a card that says &quot;Amazon $20 gift card&quot; and looks like a gift card, but the back says I have to give a 5 star review and send my order information to an outlook email address. Is this legitimate? Is it really a $20 Amazon gift card?<p>Amazon: Thank you so much for your information on this, I will certainly pass it along here so that we can check this promotion or offer directly with the seller Because I am not seeing that advertised on the item at all And would not be capable of confirming if that is a legit Amazon gift card because, I do not see that offer on the item<p>Me: So what should I do?<p>Amazon: My best suggestion would be to contact the seller directly for this through this link [redacted] So that you can confirm directly with them if this is legit or not Certainly giving away gift cards for good reviews is not professional And I have to report the seller for that<p>Me: I thought this type of offer was forbidden by Amazon&#x27;s own policies for sellers. But I will contact them using the link you sent to ask them if that&#x27;s what you recommend.</i><p>So I contacted the seller through Amazon&#x27;s closed system. This is what happened:<p><i>Me: I received your product and inside the box is a card that says &quot;Amazon $20 gift card&quot; and looks like a gift card, but the back says I have to give a 5 star review and send my order information to an outlook email address. Is this legitimate?<p>Seller: Thanks for your contact. Could you please follow the instruction and contact us on the email? Please be rest assured that we will fulfill our promise.</i><p>So, to summarize:<p>- Amazon has strict rules in place that forbid asking for 5 star reviews or paying for reviews (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sellercentral.amazon.com&#x2F;gp&#x2F;help&#x2F;help.html?itemID=1801&amp;language=en_US&amp;ref=ag_1801_cont_200336920" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;sellercentral.amazon.com&#x2F;gp&#x2F;help&#x2F;help.html?itemID=18...</a>)<p>- Amazon&#x27;s own support people have a difficult time telling the difference between violations of this policy and legitimate promotions, and leave it up to customers to contact these sellers on their own to figure it out.<p>- The rule-breakers are all too willing to lie through their teeth, brazenly using Amazon&#x27;s own communication system to do so.<p>- Nothing happened to the seller, they are still selling this equipment without penalty on Amazon and will continue to violate the rules knowing nothing will happen.<p>Amazon is completely broken.
评论 #24544268 未加载
sofargone00超过 4 年前
not really surprised about this and almost impossible to isolate with a company consisting of 1m employees and growing.