TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

EU’s high court finds UK, FR and BE surveillance regimes must respect privacy

4 点作者 cesarosum超过 4 年前

2 条评论

Cantbekhan超过 4 年前
Link to ruling : <a href="http:&#x2F;&#x2F;curia.europa.eu&#x2F;juris&#x2F;document&#x2F;document.jsf;jsessionid=F9F4030349E7EE379204044677062DBB?text=&amp;docid=232083&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=EN&amp;mode=req&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=6203607" rel="nofollow">http:&#x2F;&#x2F;curia.europa.eu&#x2F;juris&#x2F;document&#x2F;document.jsf;jsessioni...</a><p>And from what I read the summary is wrong.<p>This ruling applies to all EU+UK (including post Brexit for now) states but was requested by UK&#x2F;France&#x2F;Belgium lawyers initially.<p>This ruling also seems to mandate that all EU+UK states cannot keep metadata indefinitely&#x2F;permanently unless it&#x27;s highly targeted (as in &quot;individually targeted&quot;), within a judicial framework and only for specific high security issues.<p>So it doesn&#x27;t forbid mass surveillance per se but only seems to mandate that they can&#x27;t keep the data forever unless strictly necessary.<p>Some could even interpret this ruling as permission to do mass surveillance as long as they don&#x27;t keep the data for too long (a year? 10 years? it&#x27;s unclear)
raxxorrax超过 4 年前
As long as these practices are normal, encryption services need to be expanded and cooperation with sate actors should be minimized, preferably use platforms outside the EU.<p>The only defense against surveillance of communication channels is to make it technically impossible. Respecting privacy may be a misnomer here, they just have to adhere to EU law, which probably leaves room to let state actors continue exactly as before.<p>edit: &quot;no mass surveillance without limits&quot; titles techcrunch. As if the &quot;limits&quot; could make mass surveillance acceptable. This article is &quot;fake news&quot; in the original sense, because they actually reduced barriers for mass surveillance.
评论 #24697807 未加载
评论 #24697729 未加载