TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Cloud Native Computing Foundation Announces Rook Graduation

65 点作者 talonx超过 4 年前

7 条评论

fh973超过 4 年前
For the uninitiated: Rook is a deployment tool for Ceph and a few databases on Kubernetes. The heavy lifting is done by Ceph, the name is only mentioned in passing in the 10th paragraph.
cncfcrap超过 4 年前
Is it just me or is the CNCF ran by a bunch of marketers and product managers?<p>The entire &#x27;ecosystem&#x27; is filled with worthless crap like this with stupid marketing like &quot;incubating&quot; and &quot;graduation&quot; to infer on it some level of acceptance.<p>Are there any foundations that don&#x27;t operate like this? Are foundations good at all for anything?
评论 #24739646 未加载
评论 #24739671 未加载
评论 #24740474 未加载
评论 #24740363 未加载
评论 #24739265 未加载
评论 #24741137 未加载
评论 #24739054 未加载
评论 #24739431 未加载
manigandham超过 4 年前
Actual project here: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rook.io&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;rook.io&#x2F;</a><p>Block, file, object storage for K8S, powered by Ceph underneath. The project is diluted by also deploying databases for some reason, and I don&#x27;t recommend using it for that.<p>Overall good to see more storage options for K8S with others like Longhorn, OpenEBS, StorageOS, Portworx, etc.
emperor_超过 4 年前
I’ve ran rook for a couple of months in my test lab on virtual machines. Absolutely love it and has been super stable. Does anyone run this on bare metal in production? Running this as a hyper converge k8s setup sound like its easy to scale even if you colocate your own hardware in a dc. Which is way cheaper then cloud these days. Anyone with experience?
评论 #24743653 未加载
ram_rar超过 4 年前
Has anyone used ceph in production? If so, are there are any advanatages of using Ceph over Aws S3? It used to be pretty popular during openstack days. Lately, I havent herd much about it.
评论 #24743141 未加载
评论 #24741709 未加载
评论 #24743659 未加载
ablekh超过 4 年前
Do I understand correctly that the inclusion of YugabyteDB support in Rook&#x27;s functionality is simply based on current unavailability of the relevant native Operator by Yugabyte itself? If someone from Yugabyte is reading this, I would appreciate their comment on plans to implement such Operator. That would allow people who do not need on-premise data storage to avoid establishing and maintaining an additional significant dependency in the form of Rook.
评论 #24743637 未加载
pavelevst超过 4 年前
If cluster experience problems to run rook pods, then other pods that uses volumes will fail too. And it may cause situation where everything fails with timeout errors...<p>Nothing against rook, but the idea to run k8s storage in k8s is fragile
评论 #24741827 未加载