Reading that article left me worried. It's not very factual, it has many errorneous statements, and, honestly, it looks like propaganda.<p>Seems to me like Nature is not worried about losing credability.
Remember this Nature?<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Most_Published_Research_Findings_Are_False" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Most_Published_Research_Fi...</a><p>So much about "truth".<p>People don't have a problem with science.
They have a problem with scientists.<p>They also say how Trump is bad because of the Paris agreement for environment.
Did you know that the Paris agreement has no legal bindings? It's just a PR move by politicians.<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Agreement#Lack_of_binding_enforcement_mechanism" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Agreement#Lack_of_bindin...</a>