TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

A U.S. Election Twitter Network Graph Tool

65 点作者 joeyespo超过 4 年前

3 条评论

BitwiseFool超过 4 年前
Can anyone familiar with Twitter explain how people like Jeff Tiedrich, Eugene Gu, ToddlerTrump, TrumpOwO, etc, manage to be the first few responders to everything @realDonaldTrump tweets?<p>(Edit) To expand on this, some of these accounts are clearly bots that just modify the text of the tweet. I can see how easy it would be to make these bots - but not how they manage to be the first responses so consistently. Surely there are other competing bots trying to do the same thing?<p>Others are direct responses to the content the president tweeted about. Dr.Gu frequently writes paragraph length rebuttals but I assume such responses take time to craft - so there&#x27;s no way he could have been the first to respond with so much content, right?
评论 #24910114 未加载
评论 #24910493 未加载
评论 #24909912 未加载
jeffbee超过 4 年前
Pretty remarkable how easy it is to click your way to an insane spammer. For example the #1 inbound to Kamala Harris is some account with no followers or mentions, recently joined, posted the same reply to 600 different threads all on October 16th, liked all of its own posts, and has been dormant since.<p>Not exactly a great contribution to the discourse.
评论 #24910421 未加载
评论 #24910005 未加载
评论 #24910126 未加载
cwhiz超过 4 年前
It is obvious from these graphs than an overwhelming percentage of political discourse on Twitter is from bots. Just eyeballing it, it seems to be at least 70-90% of inbound mentions are from bots.<p>These bots are obvious enough that we should wonder what is motivating Twitter.