TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

How We'll Power The U.S. In 2035

6 点作者 spidaman大约 14 年前

2 条评论

1053r大约 14 年前
Anyone who thinks that solar will only double in install base by 2035 hasn't been paying attention. If it is, as the article says, up to 2% now, then by 2035 it should be up to a very large percentage of our current output.<p>The total amount of solar installed grew by 100% in 2010 <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/14/us-energy-solar-idUSTRE71D4WJ20110214" rel="nofollow">http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/02/14/us-energy-solar-id...</a><p>The historical rate of growth for solar has been more like 33%. <a href="http://solarisforever.com/category/compound-average-growth-rate/" rel="nofollow">http://solarisforever.com/category/compound-average-growth-r...</a><p>Therefore, one has to ask, what is going to change? There are billions of dollars invested in scaling as quickly as possible. Are we going to run out of silicon? Unlikely. Are we going to run out of rare earths? Nope. Are we going to run out of space or demand? Perhaps, but not for a long time. I'll leave it as an exercise to the reader to google for the sources to back those statements up so that I can make my ultimate point in a reasonable amount of text.<p>33% growth is doubling in a bit over 2 years. 10 doublings is a factor of 1024. So it is pretty reasonable to think that solar output will be well over 100% of our current output by 2035, and perhaps as much as 2000%.
评论 #2492523 未加载
评论 #2491631 未加载
joejohnson大约 14 年前
That first graph is almost pointless, I think. The energy densities of the different fuels being compared are vastly different. Therefore, measuring them against each other by mass is irrelevant.