TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

DotCloud releases support for Perl, aka Camel-as-a-Service

96 点作者 jpetazzo大约 14 年前

12 条评论

mmaunder大约 14 年前
Nice one guys. Our company uses mostly Perl for our server side code. We'll keep you in mind as a provider.
shykes大约 14 年前
As usual, the DotCloud team is hanging out here to answer questions, hand out truckloads of invites, etc.
评论 #2491819 未加载
daxelrod大约 14 年前
What a fantastic idea!<p>I would love to know more about the discussions you had with miyagawa, and how the design for this evolved. Anything this elegant must have taken a ton of iterations.<p>Oh, and may I have an invite, please?
questorian大约 14 年前
We are a Perl shop and this is good new for us - we need PSGI and multiple databases - This _could_ be the step we are looking for to offload our web stack...it is taking too much time to manage all that, rather than getting on with coding!
agentultra大约 14 年前
Great news for the Perl community. Congrats! And thanks as well to dotcloud for making it happen. :)
grout大约 14 年前
I would like one (1) invite. Or maybe two. Please?
评论 #2491921 未加载
davecardwell大约 14 年前
Are there plans for a “Perl worker” component?
评论 #2492336 未加载
poisonbit大约 14 年前
Codes exhausted... anyway nice to read this.<p>DotCloud++ Miyagawa++ Perl++<p>Good luck !
g123g大约 14 年前
This entry in their FAQ after the April 21st outage brought a chuckle-<p>Where is DotCloud hosted?<p>DotCloud runs on Amazon EC2. More specifically, we run on the us-east-1 region, across multiple availability zones.
评论 #2492315 未加载
评论 #2492347 未加载
kengat大约 14 年前
this looks really cool. please send an invite code my way and i'll kick the tires. thanks in advance.
bbbbbbbbb大约 14 年前
it seems I am not the only to not get the point of PSGI:<p><a href="http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2011/03/why-psgiplack-matters-testing.html#comment-794" rel="nofollow">http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2011/03/why-psgiplack-matt...</a><p>It resumes quite well my opinion and concern regarding the doc.
bbbbbbbbb大约 14 年前
huh?<p>- No Apache????<p>- why force a rather devish level PSGI module on all web applications???? oh, yeah, you've been advised by the guy who made the port...<p><pre><code> i've been using CGI::Fast under Apache for years and it has been working just PERFECTLY fine. Do not see the need to change especially when the PSGI doc is so badly written... At least the doc states that people who supports mod_perl/CGI::Fast will not see much benefit of switching to PSGI... </code></pre> - what is the Perl version?
评论 #2492230 未加载
评论 #2492669 未加载
评论 #2492320 未加载