On one hand, I want to say good on them. While I'm sure this was mostly a PR thing, at a time when unemployment is high (especially for unskilled laborers) any news like "62,000 new hires" seems like good news.<p>On the other hand, 62,000 new employees nationwide breaks down to something like 3-4 new employees per store. This sort of large-scale, top-down action seems like it has huge potentials to create inefficiencies. How many of these new hires will be let go in a month because they're not needed? Maybe none, maybe there really were 62,000 positions to be filled nationwide and each store was able to hire the exact right number of folks.<p>Which brings me to my third hand, that is, a well-publicized "national hiring event" certainly was smart -- it probably brings in a much larger pool of applicants, letting them select more well-qualified people all at once, rather than on an ad-hoc basis.