TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

Apple removes then restores DoNotPay app in the App Store

159 点作者 danielinoa超过 4 年前

15 条评论

sushid超过 4 年前
As an aside, their website uses a serious dark pattern to trick users into paying. Their app is purportedly for helping you reclaim your fees so it seems like adding a bank account makes sense after you input your email address.<p>Off to the right you see the text &gt; &quot;...you agree to charge a $36 a year subscription to this payment method.&quot;<p>There&#x27;s no mention of a $36 &#x2F; annual anywhere else. It&#x27;s on the margin to clearly trick the user when simply adding a payment info.
评论 #24995833 未加载
pwinnski超过 4 年前
Update: It was indefensible, and Apple has already reversed course. It&#x27;s a shame it sometimes takes twitter outcry for the right thing to happen, but at least the right thing happened.<p>This seem indefensible at first blush. The app has been available as-is for years, so if the explanation given him is correct, it&#x27;s a really bad look for Apple.
评论 #24987235 未加载
评论 #24986710 未加载
ksec超过 4 年前
After the reversal, Developers are chanting &quot;Awesome&quot;, &quot;This is great&quot;, &quot;Running to Twitter helped&quot;, etc etc. Not a single developer asked <i>why</i> and <i>how</i> did it happen in the first place.<p>The original purpose of the App Store guidelines were to protect the users &#x2F; customers. And it did!. It worked great. And Apple charge you 30% for Digital Goods. And nothing for physical goods. It was Fair. 30% for the likes of Gaming, Productivity Apps such as Office, Camera, Calendar, Photo Editing etc etc. That was fine. And true to its words, Steve&#x27;s Apple had all the rationale in nearly all rejection cases.<p>These days App Store policy is much more about rent seeking, their sole purpose is no longer serving its users and customer&#x27;s best interest. But used in every opportunity to extract more revenues from these Apps <i>and</i> Services. Not to mention how many of these letters from Apple suggest Developers of Free ( as in beer ) Apps contributed <i>nothing</i> to the App Store and act as a &quot;Free Rider&quot; on Apple&#x27;s platform. Compounded by Tim Cook&#x27;s comment on App Store and being user first.<p>Normally I give some benefits of doubt to CEO as they may not be on top of all the things happening in a company. But judging from the Apple vs IMG and Apple vs Qualcomm cases I think he knows exactly what he is doing.<p>This whole things stinks and reeks of hypocrisy to me.
评论 #24989116 未加载
admax88q超过 4 年前
I&#x27;m starting to suspect were hitting peak Apple. It feels like they might be pushing in app purchase through apple pay as their means for continued revenue growth rather than product innovation.
评论 #24986667 未加载
评论 #24986926 未加载
评论 #24986674 未加载
gnicholas超过 4 年前
I had an interesting and somewhat similar experience, where a long-standing app feature triggered an unexpected rejection. We gnashed our teeth for a couple weeks and finally submitted an appeal. I expected it to be rejected, since the original reviewer was steadfast in rejecting the app and our arguments.<p>But it was immediately approved on appeal, to our great surprise. I wonder if Apple is aware that they&#x27;re treading on thin(ner) ice with regard to the App Store.
forgotmypw17超过 4 年前
This demonstrates the amazing power of social media.<p>It only took 2-3 hours for one of the largest, most powerful corporations, to reverse their decision.
评论 #24986654 未加载
评论 #24987139 未加载
评论 #24986613 未加载
评论 #24988209 未加载
评论 #24987236 未加载
meowster超过 4 年前
I&#x27;ve heard about the app when it started just for parking tickets. I didn&#x27;t know it expanded to other legal issues including small claims court filings, asylum, visas, green cards, and housing for homeless. Amazing.
tgsovlerkhgsel超过 4 年前
Every app needs to have a built-in messaging channel that allows you to display rich-text (including <i>clickable</i> links) &quot;news and updates&quot; to your existing users.<p>That way, when you do get kicked out from an app store, at least you can direct users to your web site (which is probably a violation of app store guidelines, but if it&#x27;s your only&#x2F;main revenue generating app, and already kicked out, having this option can be a lifesaver).
评论 #24987278 未加载
jaimex2超过 4 年前
I really don&#x27;t like Apple and would never develop something in their store but I have to admit - at least a human called him and he had some dialog. If this was Google it would have been shut down without any recourse and probably taken the devs entire Google account with it.
mytailorisrich超过 4 年前
This is probably the best thing that has ever happened to that app considering the amount of publicity it gets by spinning the issue.
eganist超过 4 年前
<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;jbrowder1&#x2F;status&#x2F;1323842195560964098?s=20" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;twitter.com&#x2F;jbrowder1&#x2F;status&#x2F;1323842195560964098?s=2...</a><p>Decision reversed. Link and title should be updated to reflect.
评论 #24986474 未加载
cblconfederate超过 4 年前
&gt; fortunately, 90%+ of new subscribers now come through web, and this segment is growing rapidly<p>All i need to know. Why even have an app in the EvilStores?
MatthewElvey超过 4 年前
Of the last 25 reviews, 24 are one star. Is there a tool for charting iOS App Store reviews over time to look for weird patterns?
评论 #24987002 未加载
newbie578超过 4 年前
Okay, let&#x27;s hear from the Apple fanatics on HN why this is a good move by Apple? After all, Apple can do no wrong :)
评论 #24987286 未加载
t413超过 4 年前
As of now it appears to still be up: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;apps.apple.com&#x2F;us&#x2F;app&#x2F;donotpay&#x2F;id1427999657" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;apps.apple.com&#x2F;us&#x2F;app&#x2F;donotpay&#x2F;id1427999657</a>
评论 #24986555 未加载