TE
科技回声
首页24小时热榜最新最佳问答展示工作
GitHubTwitter
首页

科技回声

基于 Next.js 构建的科技新闻平台,提供全球科技新闻和讨论内容。

GitHubTwitter

首页

首页最新最佳问答展示工作

资源链接

HackerNews API原版 HackerNewsNext.js

© 2025 科技回声. 版权所有。

eBPF – The Future of Networking and Security

195 点作者 genbit超过 4 年前

5 条评论

Ericson2314超过 4 年前
The future ought to be capabilities. All this policy scripting stuff is just drudgery make-work that gets us nowhere.
评论 #25053853 未加载
评论 #25051419 未加载
ryanmarsh超过 4 年前
I'm not an expert in BPF by any means. My gut tells me that the hype of eBPF is an example of Hyrum's law. That is, eBPF will be leveraged beyond its design intent, as an in-kernel JIT engine. This is more a comment on human nature than the technology itself.
评论 #25050897 未加载
评论 #25050959 未加载
tgraf超过 4 年前
Disclaimer: I wrote the post.<p>Happy to answer any questions.
评论 #25051494 未加载
评论 #25055914 未加载
miohtama超过 4 年前
eBPF is also used high throughput blockchain, Solana<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;solana-labs&#x2F;rbpf" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;solana-labs&#x2F;rbpf</a><p>Unlike more common Rust + LLVM + WASM toolchain, Solana smart contracts use Rust + LLVM + eBPF.
评论 #25055615 未加载
ninjha超过 4 年前
I was under the impression that Cilium was one of the more common choices for Kubernetes CNI but judging by the other comments... maybe not?<p>We’re currently moving to Kubernetes for our infrastructure at the Berkeley OCF (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ocf.berkeley.edu&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ocf.berkeley.edu&#x2F;</a>), and picked Cilium for all the networking things.<p>It’s good to see that there’s a company backing it now!